David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Humanities 23 (2):107-118 (2002)
Reproductive techniques and practices, ranging from ordinary birth-control measures and artificial insemination to embryo transfer and surrogate motherhood, have greatly enhanced our range of reproductive choices. As a consequence, they pose a number of difficult moral and legal questions with regard to the formation of a family and our conception of parenthood. A view that is becoming increasingly common is that parental rights and responsibilities should not be based on genetic relationships but should instead be seen as arising from agreements or contracts between individuals. Accordingly, a man who consents to his wife's artificial insemination by donor (AID) and not the sperm donor, is the legal father of the child; in surrogacy agreements, the intending mother, and not the surrogate, has the right to raise the resulting child. While agreeing that biology should not form the basis for assigning legal parenthood, I argue that the theory of intentional parenthood, despite being put forward as a liberal theory, is geared toward or will have the function of protecting the nuclear family and inhibiting the formation of alternative family forms
|Keywords||intentional parenthood surrogate motherhood nuclear family reproductive technology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Matteo Galletti (2006). Begetting, Cloning and Being Human: Two National Commission Reports Against Human Cloning From Italy and the U.S.A. HEC Forum 18 (2):156-171.
Similar books and articles
Liezl van Zyl (2002). Intentional Parenthood: Responsibilities in Surrogate Motherhood. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 10 (2):165-175.
Daniela Cutas & Sarah Chan (2012). Families – Beyond the Nuclear Ideal. Bloomsbury Academic.
Derek Ettinger (2012). Genes, Gestation, and Social Norms. Law and Philosophy 31 (3):243-268.
Claudia Wiesemann (2010). The Moral Challenge of Natality: Towards a Post-Traditional Concept of Family and Privacy in Reprogenetics. The New Genetics and Society 29:61-71.
Joseph Millum (2010). How Do We Acquire Parental Rights? Social Theory and Practice 36 (1):112-132.
Ruth Deech & Anna Smajdor (2007). From Ivf to Immortality: Controversy in the Era of Reproductive Technology. OUP Oxford.
Martha Minow & Mary Lyndon Shanley (1996). Relational Rights and Responsibilities: Revisioning the Family in Liberal Political Theory and Law. Hypatia 11 (1):4 - 29.
Brenda Almond (2008). The Fragmenting Family. OUP Oxford.
David Archard (2012). The Future of the Family. Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):132-142.
Christian Munthe & Thomas Hartvigsson (2012). The Best Interest of Children and the Basis of Family Policy: The Issue of Reproductive Caring Units. In Daniela Cutas & Sarah Chan (eds.), Families: Beyond the Nuclear Ideal. Bloomsbury Academic
Christian Schmitt, Gender-Specific Effects of Unemployment on Family Formation: A Cross-National Perspective.
Rosalie Ber (2000). Ethical Issues in Gestational Surrogacy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (2):153-169.
Naomi R. Cahn (2012). The New Kinship: Constructing Donor-Conceived Families. New York University Press.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads23 ( #143,355 of 1,781,295 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #123,275 of 1,781,295 )
How can I increase my downloads?