Actions as Special Cases

Abstract

This paper is motivated by the idea of interaction between two directions of research in knowledge representation: the design of action description languages and the development of libraries of reusable, general-purpose knowledge components. Writing an action description that characterizes actions in terms of their effects, as common today, can be compared to writing a program that does not use standard subroutines. We conjecture that a library of standard descriptions for a number of “basic” actions can facilitate writing, understanding and modifying action descriptions. In this paper, we take some steps towards determining how such a library, written in the action language C+, can be used. When using an instance of a library action description, we relate the library constants to the domain-specific constants by providing definitions. Therefore, a theory of explicit definitions in C+ is developed. To illustrate the use of the library, we show how the action PushBox in the Monkey and Bananas domain can be described as a special case of the “library action” Move.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Non‐Observational Knowledge of Action.John Schwenkler - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (10):731-740.
Can a single action have many different descriptions?Arthur B. Cody - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):164 – 180.
On Action Theory Change.Ivan José Varzinczak - 2010 - Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 37 (1):189-246.
Knowledge in action.John Gibbons - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):579-600.
On describing actions.David Rayfield - 1970 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):90 – 99.
What is mirrored by mirror neurons?Benjamin Rathgeber & Mathias Gutmann - 2008 - Poiesis and Praxis 5 (3-4):233-247.
'Can an action have many descriptions?'?R. E. Dowling - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):447-448.
Does Philosophy of Action Rest on a Mistake?Andrew Sneddon - 2001 - Metaphilosophy 32 (5):502-522.
The intentionality of intention and action.John R. Searle - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):253 – 280.
Volition and basic action.Hugh McCann - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (4):451-473.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
17 (#849,202)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Some properties of system descriptions of.Michael Gelfond & Daniela Inclezan - 2013 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 23 (1-2):105-120.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references