Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- M. Lifshitz (1948). Giambattista Vico (1668-1744). Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 8 (3):391-414.
Similar books and articles
This paper juxtaposes the thought of Carl G. Jung to that of Giambattista Vico (d. 1744), aiming primarily at overturning all currently dominant historicist readings of Vico's political philosophy. On the way, I illuminate Vico's rational or non-dogmatic response to both medieval Christian theology and modern "scientific" philosophy (from Descartes to Galileo, from Machiavelli and Spinoza to Hobbes and Grotius). The Vico emerging through his own arguments and "reasoning" (ragionamenti) is a reviver of political philosophy in the Socratic tradition of Plato and Cicero.
Introduction to Giambattista Vico: The Anglo-American perspective Marcel Danesi.
Giambattista Vico (-) In, the Neapolitan rhetorician and philosopher, ...
This work concerns the development of the thought of Giambattista Vico (1668–1744) during approximately the first half of his career at the University of Naples, from his appointment as Professor of Rhetoric in 1699 to the appearance of his First New Science in 1725. It concentrates on Vico’s short history of the failed coup against Spanish rule in Naples, his series of inaugural university orations on pedagogy, and the three books of his work on universal law, the Diritto universale. Professor Naddeo’s work concludes with a few pages of remarks on the New Science of 1725 but excludes any discussion of the text for which Vico is most known and that accounts for his designation as the founder of the philosophy of ..
The late Narthrop Frye (1912-1991) stands out as one of the most acclaimed and influential literary critics of the twentieth century. Among the authors from whom Frye acknowledged to have drawn inspiration we find the political philosopher Giambattista Vico (1668-1744). But Frye’s appreciation of Vico came with significant reservations. While Frye found Vico useful to the extent that the Italian philosopher could be very freely adapted to Frye’s literary vision, beyond that point Frye would not “buy” what Vico had to say. While being fully aware that his adaptation of Vico did not harmonize with the philosopher’s overall theoretical position, Frye set out to put some elements of Vico’s work to use outside of their original argumentative setting.
The theories of language and society of Giambattista Vico (1668-1744) are examined in this textual analysis of the full range of his theoretical writings, with special emphasis on his little-known early works. Vico's fundamental importance in the history of European ideas lies in his strong anti-Cartesian, anti-French and anti-Enlightenment views. In an age in which intellectuals adopted a rational approach, Vico stressed the nonrational element in man - in particular, imagination - as well as social and civil relationships, none of them reducible to the scientific theories so popular in his time.
No categories
Preface Giambattista Vico (1668-1744) was throughout his mature years professor
of Latin Eloquence at the University of Naples. His works, first written in ...
Discussion of M. Lifshitz, Giambattista Vico (1668-1744)
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

