Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1029-1030 (1999)
|Abstract||Not only do grammars have the dual structure that Clahsen discusses but the lexicon contains atomic, unanalyzed items, which would be still more mysterious for single-mechanism models. Forms of be in modern English are listed atomically and this is not a simple function of their morphological richness or of the fact that they move.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alessandro Laudanna (1999). Regular Versus Irregular Inflection: A Question of Levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1029-1030.
Peter Indefrey (1999). Some Problems with the Lexical Status of Nondefault Inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1025-1025.
Brigitte Nerlich & David D. Clarke (1999). Are Rules and Entries Enough? Historical Reflections on a Longstanding Controversy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1032-1033.
Yoad Winter (2001). Plural Predication and the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis. Journal of Semantics 18 (4):333-365.
Harald Clahsen (1999). Lexical Entries and Rules of Language: A Multidisciplinary Study of German Inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):991-1013.
Geert Booij (1999). Lexical Storage and Regular Processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1016-1016.
Alex Lascarides (1996). Ambiguity and Coherence. Journal of Semantics 13 (1):41-65.
M. C. Laskowski & S. Shelah (1993). On the Existence of Atomic Models. Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (4):1189-1194.
Greville G. Corbett (1999). Investigating Lexical Entries and Rules: A Typological Perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1019-1020.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #245,513 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?