Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 138 (2):151-60 (2008)
|Abstract||The Brock-Rosen problem has been one of the most thoroughly discussed objections to the modal fictionalism bruited in Gideon Rosen’s ‘Modal Fictionalism’. But there is a more fundamental problem with modal fictionalism, at least as it is normally explained: the position does not resolve the tension that motivated it. I argue that if we pay attention to a neglected aspect of modal fictionalism, we will see how to resolve this tension—and we will also find a persuasive reply to the Brock-Rosen objection. Finally, I discuss an alternative reading of Rosen, and argue that this position is also able to fend off the Brock-Rosen objection.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Daniel Nolan, Modal Fictionalism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Gideon Rosen (2005). Problems in the History of Fictionalism. In Mark Eli Kalderon (ed.), Fictionalism in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Gideon Rosen (1995). Modal Fictionalism Fixed. Analysis 55 (2):67-73.
Richard Woodward (2008). Why Modal Fictionalism is Not Self-Defeating. Philosophical Studies 139 (2):273 - 288.
Wen-Fang Wang (2007). Modal Fictionalism and Hale's Dilemma Against It. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:51-56.
Richard Woodward (2011). Is Modal Fictionalism Artificial? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):535-550.
Gideon Rosen (1990). Modal Fictionalism. Mind 99 (395):327-354.
Stuart Brock (1993). Modal Fictionalism: A Response to Rosen. Mind 102 (405):147-150.
Gideon Rosen (1993). A Problem for Fictionalism About Possible Worlds. Analysis 53 (2):71 - 81.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads152 ( #3,281 of 739,317 )
Recent downloads (6 months)22 ( #5,790 of 739,317 )
How can I increase my downloads?