Nihilism without Self-Contradiction

in Robin Le Poidevin (ed.) Being: Developments in Contemporary Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Peter van Inwagen claims that there are no tables or chairs. He also claims that sentences such as ‘There are chairs here’, which seem to imply their existence, are often true. This combination of views opens van Inwagen to a charge of self-contradiction. I explain the charge, and van Inwagen’s response to it, which involves the claim that sentences like ‘There are tables’ shift their truth-conditions between different contexts of utterance. I present an alternative response which involves the negation of that claim, and argue that it is preferable to van Inwagen’s.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1358246108000635
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive David Liggins, Nihilism without Self-Contradiction
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Ned Markosian (1998). Brutal Composition. Philosophical Studies 92 (3):211 - 249.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Sam Cowling (2013). Ideological Parsimony. Synthese 190 (17):3889-3908.
Daniel Z. Korman (2016). Ordinary Objects. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

387 ( #5,181 of 1,937,444 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

80 ( #4,280 of 1,937,444 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.