On being twice as heavy

Philosophia Mathematica 11 (2):203-7 (2003)
Abstract This note considers a recent challenge to Field's nominalization programme due to Joseph Melia, who argues that Field's treatment of mass involves unacceptable ontological extravagance. I explain how Field can get around the difficulty by adding a new operator to his language. This tactic appears to threaten Field's argument against relationism about space; I argue, however, that this is not a genuine problem.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,705
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Louise Richardson (2010). Seeing Empty Space. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):227-243.
    Brent Mundy (1989). On Quantitative Relationist Theories. Philosophy of Science 56 (4):582-600.
    Don Robinson (1992). Renormalization and the Effective Field Theory Programme. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:393 - 403.
    Jerzy Gołosz (1999). On Field's Argument for Substantivalism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):5 – 16.
    David Baker (2009). Against Field Interpretations of Quantum Field Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):585 - 609.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2009-01-28

    Total downloads

    16 ( #74,716 of 549,128 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums