Graduate studies at Western
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (2):177-196 (2008)
|Abstract||Truthmaker theorists claim that for every truth, there is something in virtue of which it is true—or, more cautiously, that for every truth in some specified class of truths, there is something in virtue of which it is true. I argue that it is hard to see how the thought that truth is grounded in reality lends any support to truthmaker theory.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Julian Dodd (2007). Negative Truths and Truthmaker Principles. Synthese 156 (2):383-401.
Jamin Asay (2011). Truthmaking, Truth, and Realism: New Work for a Theory of Truthmakers. Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2008). Postscript to Why Truthmakers. In E. J. Lowe & A. Rami (eds.), Truth and Truth-making. Acumen.
Ross P. Cameron (2008). Comments on Merricks'struth and Ontology. Philosophical Books 49 (4):292-301.
Timothy Pawl (2010). The Possibility Principle and the Truthmakers for Modal Truths. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):417-428.
Ross P. Cameron (2008). How to Be a Truthmaker Maximalist. Noûs 42 (3):410 - 421.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads166 ( #2,717 of 754,397 )
Recent downloads (6 months)31 ( #3,790 of 754,397 )
How can I increase my downloads?