Informal Logic: Reasoning and Argumentation in Theory and Practice 30 (2):185-193 (2010)
|Abstract||Our article identifies and describes the metaphoric fallacy to a deductive inference (MFDI) that is an example of incorrect reasoning along the lines of the false analogy fallacy. The MFDI proceeds from informal semantical (metaphorical) claims to a supposedly formally deductive and necessary inference. We charge that such an inference is invalid. We provide three examples of the MFDI to demonstrate the structure of this invalid form of reasoning. Our goal is to contribute to the set of known informal fallacies.|
|Keywords||analogy critical thinking fallacy metaphor Nietzsche Sartre Phaedo|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. V. Dougherty (2004). The Comparative Set Fallacy. Argumentation 18 (2):213-222.
Joel Marks (1988). When is a Fallacy Not a Fallacy? Metaphilosophy 19 (3‐4):307-312.
Dr Paul Franceschi, A Characterization of the One-Sidedness Fallacy Within the Framework of the Cognitive Distortions.
Maurice Hamington (2009). Business is Not a Game: The Metaphoric Fallacy. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 86 (4):473 - 484.
Wanda Teays (2009). Second Thoughts: Critical Thinking for a Diverse Society. Mcgraw-Hill Higher Education.
Louise Cummings (2002). Hilary Putnam's Dialectical Thinking: An Application to Fallacy Theory. [REVIEW] Argumentation 16 (2):197-229.
Cliff Ermatinger (2005). Common Nonsense: 25 Fallacies About Life (and Their Solutions). Circle Press.
William Goodwin (2010). The 'Passes-For' Fallacy and the Future of Critical Thinking. Argumentation 24 (3):363-374.
Added to index2010-08-16
Total downloads35 ( #39,222 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?