David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Much recent scholarship has posited that computer-assisted legal research will fundamentally alter the manner in which practicing attorneys conduct legal research, resulting in an overall change to the legal system itself. Ms. Lihosit argues that, while we have been undergoing a major transformation in the format of legal materials, and the influence of the West digest system is waning, there will not be a resultant restructuring of the legal system. After a brief overview of American legal history, provided to show that apprenticeship training has always been present in the American legal system in some form, the article uses the author’s study of practicing attorneys and law firm librarians to provide an alternative model of how attorneys conduct research.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter Cane & Mark V. Tushnet (eds.) (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies. Oxford University Press.
Howard Turtle (1995). Text Retrieval in the Legal World. Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (1-2):5-54.
Alan Strudler (2010). New Directions in Legal Scholarship. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (3):503-531.
James R. Maxeiner, American Law Schools as a Model for Japanese Legal Education? A Preliminary Question From a Comparative Perspective.
Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-05-17
Total downloads4 ( #532,787 of 1,790,223 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #427,635 of 1,790,223 )
How can I increase my downloads?