Biology and Philosophy 25 (3):361-378 (2010)
|Abstract||Darwin’s treatment of morality in The Descent of Man has generated a wide variety of responses among moral philosophers. Among these is the dismissal of evolution as irrelevant to ethics by Darwin’s contemporary Henry Sidgwick; the last, and arguably the greatest, of the Nineteenth Century British Utilitarians. This paper offers a re-examination of Sidgwick’s response to evolutionary considerations as irrelevant to ethics and the absence of any engagement with Darwin’s work in Sidgwick’s main ethical treatise, The Methods of Ethics . This assessment of Sidgwick’s response to Darwin’s work is shown to have significance for a number of ongoing controversies in contemporary metaethics.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Henry Sidgwick (2000). Essays on Ethics and Method. Oxford University Press.
John Deigh (2004). Sidgwick's Conception of Ethics. Utilitas 16 (2):168-183.
Bart Schultz (2004). The Methods of J. B. Schneewind. Utilitas 16 (2):146-167.
Bart Schultz (ed.) (1992). Essays on Henry Sidgwick. Cambridge University Press.
Penelope Deutscher (2004). The Descent of Man and the Evolution of Woman. Hypatia 19 (2):35-55.
Anthony Skelton (2010). On Sidgwick's Demise. Utilitas 22 (1):70-77.
Michael Ruse (ed.) (2009). Philosophy After Darwin: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Princeton University Press.
Anthony Skelton (2007). Schultz's Sidgwick. Utilitas 19 (1):91-103.
Added to index2010-03-13
Total downloads71 ( #14,647 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,982 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?