Review. From metaphysics to ethics: A defence of conceptual analysis
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):169-173 (1999)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAlexander S. Harper (2012). An Oblique Epistemic Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Metaphilosophy 43 (3):235-256.
Andres Gleeson (1999). Deducing the Mind. Inquiry 42 (3-4):385-410.
Katalin Balog (2001). Commentary on Frank Jackson's From Metaphysics to Ethics. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):645–652.
David Plunkett (2011). Expressivism, Representation, and the Nature of Conceptual Analysis. Philosophical Studies 156 (1):15-31.
Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis (2003). Concepts and Conceptual Analysis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2):253-282.
Simon Blackburn (2000). Critical Notice of Frank Jackson, From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (1):119 – 124.
Frank Jackson (2000). 2. In From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Clarendon Press.
D. G. Witmer (2000). From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Philosophical Review 109 (3):459-462.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads23 ( #53,739 of 548,977 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,977 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
