Smith on moral fetishism

Analysis 57 (3):187–195 (1997)
In his book The Moral Problem and in a recent issue of this journal, Michael Smith claims to refute any theory which construes the relationship between moral judgements and motivation as contingent and rationally optional. Smith’s argument fails. In showing how it fails, I shall make three claims. First, a concern for what is right, where this is read de dicto, does not amount to moral fetishism. Second, it is not always morally preferable to care about what is right, where this is read de re. Third, the externalist can account for why a good and strong-willed person is reliably motivated in accordance with her moral judgements without appealing to a basic moral motive to do what is right, where this is read de dicto.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00073
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Hallvard Lillehammer, Smith on moral fetishism
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Paulina Sliwa (2015). Moral Worth and Moral Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (2):n/a-n/a.
Andy Egan (2012). Relativist Dispositional Theories of Value. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):557-582.
Hallvard Lillehammer (2002). Moral Cognitivism. Philosophical Papers 31 (1):1-25.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Terence D. Cuneo (1999). An Externalist Solution to the "Moral Problem". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (2):359-380.
Philip Nickel (2001). Moral Testimony and its Authority. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):253-266.
Sergio Tenenbaum (2011). Externalism, Motivation, and Moral Knowledge. In Susana Nuccetelli & Gary Seay (eds.), Ethical Naturalism: Current Debates. Cambridge University Press
James Dreier (2000). Dispositions and Fetishes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):619 - 638.
Teemu Toppinen (2004). Moral Fetishism Revisited. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (3):305–313.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

286 ( #2,863 of 1,725,310 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

103 ( #5,521 of 1,725,310 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.