David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 10 (1):49-59 (2000)
The concept of legitimacy is at the heart of the theory of power. It is essential to understand how a political power is built and how obedience is obtained among the population. We examine here the legitimacy of power for two of the most important political philosophies of classical China: Confucianism and Legalism. We show how a specific group of the population, the scholar-officials, play a specialised role in the two systems, acting as a legitimisation group. We further compare rites and laws as a way to obtain social order, and morality vs punishments as a way to obtain obedience. We conclude that the Confucianist system is less fragile than the Legalist, but also more oppressive, since it allows fewer personal choices to individuals
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Enzo Rossi (2012). Justice, Legitimacy, and (Normative) Authority for Political Realists. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (2):149-164.
Vatro Murvar (ed.) (1985). Theory of Liberty, Legitimacy, and Power: New Directions in the Intellectual and Scientific Legacy of Max Weber. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Fabienne Peter, Political Legitimacy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Chris Armbruster, Theory of Domination: Legitimacy, Authority, Hierarchy - Theorie der Herrschaft: Legitimität, Autorität, Hierarchie.
A. Buchanan (2011). Reciprocal Legitimation: Reframing the Problem of International Legitimacy. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):5-19.
Thomas Szasz (1982). On the Legitimacy of Psychiatric Power. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (3):315-324.
Stuart D. B. Picken (1997). The Imperial Systems in Traditional China and Japan: A Comparative Analysis of Contrasting Political Philosophies and Their Contemporary Significance. Asian Philosophy 7 (2):109 – 121.
M. Coakley (2011). On the Value of Political Legitimacy. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (4):345-369.
Li (2000). A Comparison of the Legitimacy of Power Between Confucianist and Legalist Philosophies. Asian Philosophy 10 (1):49 – 59.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads9 ( #237,242 of 1,707,725 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #352,634 of 1,707,725 )
How can I increase my downloads?