David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Islamic Philosophy 5:75-98 (2009)
This article offers a comparative study of three thinkers from almost as many intellectual and cultural traditions: Avicenna, Maimonides, and Gersonides, and discusses the extent of the knowledge of particulars which each one ascribed to God. Avicenna de-reified Aristotle’s abstract and isolated Prime Mover and argued that God can know particulars but limited these to universals. Maimonides disanalogized divine from human knowledge, arguing that the epistemic mode predicated of mankind cannot be equally predicated of God, and that God knows particulars qua particulars even as his Knowing encompasses all of eternity in a single act of knowledge. Attempting an intermediate path between the former’s highly discursive reasoning and the latter’s more scriptural approach, Gersonides postulated that God can know particulars qua particulars—as is befitting a Perfect Being—but this He does ‘mediately’ as it were, via the emanative ordering comprising the separate intelligences and culminating in the Active Intellect
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter Adamson (2005). On Knowledge of Particulars. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (3):273–294.
T. L. S. Sprigge (1997). Spinoza and Indexicals. Inquiry 40 (1):3 – 22.
Charles H. Manekin (2002). Maimonides on Divine Knowledge—Moses of Narbonne's Averroist Reading. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1):51-74.
Norbert Max Samuelson (1972). Gersonides' Account of God's Knowledge of Particulars. Journal of the History of Philosophy 10 (4):399-416.
Larry Lee Blackman (1983). Russell on the Relations of Universals and Particulars. Philosophy Research Archives 9:265-278.
Noa Latham (2002). Spatiotemporal and Spatial Particulars. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):17-35.
Laird Addis (1967). Particulars and Acquaintance. Philosophy of Science 34 (3):251-259.
Michael J. Loux (ed.) (1970/1976). Universals and Particulars: Readings in Ontology. University of Notre Dame Press.
Theodore Sider (2006). Bare Particulars. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
Monima Chadha (2001). Perceptual Cognition: A Nyaya-Kantian Approach. Philosophy East and West 51 (2):197-209.
Herbert Hochberg (1995). Particulars As Universals. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:83-111.
Martin Schmidt (2008). On Spacetime, Points, and Bare Particulars. Metaphysica 9 (1):69-77.
Diana Lobel (2002). “Silence Is Praise to You”. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1):25-49.
Maria van der Schaar (2004). The Red of a Rose. On the Significance of Stout's Category of Abstract Particulars. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):197-216.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads33 ( #106,393 of 1,781,363 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #44,184 of 1,781,363 )
How can I increase my downloads?