Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:61-72 (2005)
|Abstract||The U.S. Catholic Bishops (2000) have endorsed a model of criminal justice that is restorative rather than retributive. Some interpreters of Catholic tradition defend retribution as a necessary feature of responding to crime (e.g., John Finnis). I argue in this paper that this difference is substantive, not merely linguistic. The essential question is what elements of past Catholic thinking about criminal justice are normative for today. I argue that there are strong moral reasons,consistent with both Catholic tradition and larger principles of social justice, to endorse the bishops’ statement on criminal justice reform, and with it a restorativeapproach to crime|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Rescher (2004). Respect for Tradition (And the Catholic Philosopher Today). Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:1-9.
Thaddeus Metz (2004). The Justice of Crime Prevention. Theoria 51 (105):104-128.
Charles E. Curran (1988). Ethical Principles of Catholic Social Teaching Behind the United States Bishops' Letter on the Economy. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (6):413 - 417.
Normand J. Paulhus (1987). Uses and Misuses of the Term "Social Justice" in the Roman Catholic Tradition. Journal of Religious Ethics 15 (2):261 - 282.
Roger Wertheimer (1991). Preferring Punishment of Criminals Over Provisions for Victims. In D. Sank & D. Caplan (eds.), To Be a Victim. Plenum.
Karen Stohr (2010). &Quot;honors, Awards, and the Catholic Moral Tradition&Quot;. Journal of Catholic Legal Studies 49 (2):277-292.
Michael A. Simons, Catholic Teaching, Catholic Values, and Catholic Voters: Reflections on Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship.
Charles E. Curran (1985). Just Taxation in the Roman Catholic Tradition. Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (1):113 - 133.
John J. DiIulio Jr (2006). Catholic Social Teaching, Racial Reconciliation, and Criminal Justice. Journal of Catholic Social Thought 3 (1):121-136.
D. K. (2001). Negotiated Measures - the Institutional Micropolitics of Official Criminal Justice Statistics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (4):705-722.
Bernard G. Prusak (2005). The Ancients, the Moderns, and the Court. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:189-200.
Barbara Joans & Elizabeth Hegeman (1982). Book Notes. [REVIEW] Criminal Justice Ethics 1 (1):56-57.
Nick Tilley (2003). Review Essay/Understanding Crime, Liberalism, and Science. Criminal Justice Ethics 22 (1):50-55.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads1 ( #291,386 of 722,815 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?