David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:61-72 (2005)
The U.S. Catholic Bishops (2000) have endorsed a model of criminal justice that is restorative rather than retributive. Some interpreters of Catholic tradition defend retribution as a necessary feature of responding to crime (e.g., John Finnis). I argue in this paper that this difference is substantive, not merely linguistic. The essential question is what elements of past Catholic thinking about criminal justice are normative for today. I argue that there are strong moral reasons,consistent with both Catholic tradition and larger principles of social justice, to endorse the bishops’ statement on criminal justice reform, and with it a restorativeapproach to crime
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Rescher (2004). Respect for Tradition (And the Catholic Philosopher Today). Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:1-9.
Thaddeus Metz (2004). The Justice of Crime Prevention. Theoria 51 (105):104-128.
Charles E. Curran (1988). Ethical Principles of Catholic Social Teaching Behind the United States Bishops' Letter on the Economy. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (6):413 - 417.
Normand J. Paulhus (1987). Uses and Misuses of the Term "Social Justice" in the Roman Catholic Tradition. Journal of Religious Ethics 15 (2):261 - 282.
Roger Wertheimer (1991). Preferring Punishment of Criminals Over Provisions for Victims. In D. Sank & D. Caplan (eds.), To Be a Victim. Plenum.
Karen Stohr (2010). &Quot;honors, Awards, and the Catholic Moral Tradition&Quot;. Journal of Catholic Legal Studies 49 (2):277-292.
Michael A. Simons, Catholic Teaching, Catholic Values, and Catholic Voters: Reflections on Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship.
Charles E. Curran (1985). Just Taxation in the Roman Catholic Tradition. Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (1):113 - 133.
John J. DiIulio Jr (2006). Catholic Social Teaching, Racial Reconciliation, and Criminal Justice. Journal of Catholic Social Thought 3 (1):121-136.
D. K. (2001). Negotiated Measures - the Institutional Micropolitics of Official Criminal Justice Statistics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (4):705-722.
Bernard G. Prusak (2005). The Ancients, the Moderns, and the Court. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:189-200.
Barbara Joans & Elizabeth Hegeman (1982). Book Notes. [REVIEW] Criminal Justice Ethics 1 (1):56-57.
Nick Tilley (2003). Review Essay/Understanding Crime, Liberalism, and Science. Criminal Justice Ethics 22 (1):50-55.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads1 ( #467,866 of 1,147,203 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?