David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (6):609-620 (1998)
Citation data have become an increasingly significant source of information for historians, sociologists, and other researchers studying the evolution of science. In the past few decades elaborate methodologies have been developed for the use of citation data in the study of the modern history of science. This article focuses on how citation indexes make it possible to trace the background and development of discoveries as well as to assess the credit that publishing scientists assign to particular discoverers. Kuhn's notion of discovery is discussed. The priority dispute over the discovery of the AIDS virus is used as an example.
|Keywords||AIDS citation analysis history of science scientific discovery Nobel Prize|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Bartelborth (2004). Wofür Sprechen Die Daten? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 35 (1):13-40.
Zhenzhong Ma (2009). The Status of Contemporary Business Ethics Research: Present and Future. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 90 (3):255 - 265.
Noretta Koertge (1982). Explaining Scientific Discovery. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:14 - 28.
David B. Resnik (1997). A Proposal for a New System of Credit Allocation in Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):237-243.
Eugene Garfield & Alfred Welljams-Dorof (1992). Of Nobel Class: A Citation Perspective on High Impact Research Authors. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 13 (2).
Michael Strevens (2006). The Role of the Matthew Effect in Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (2):159-170.
K. Brad Wray (2010). Philosophy of Science: What Are the Key Journals in the Field? Erkenntnis 72 (3):423 - 430.
William F. Brewer & Clark A. Chinn (1994). Scientists' Responses to Anomalous Data: Evidence From Psychology, History, and Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:304 - 313.
Joan E. Sieber & Bruce E. Trumbo (1995). (Not) Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: Citation of Data Sets. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):11-20.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #151,346 of 1,099,696 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #87,690 of 1,099,696 )
How can I increase my downloads?