Journal of Business Ethics 85:303 - 323 (2009)
|Abstract||Organizations that believe they should "give something back" to the society have embraced the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Although the theoretical underpinnings of CSR have been frequently debated, empirical studies often involve only limited aspects, implying that theory may not be congruent with actual practices and may impede understanding and further development of CSR. The authors investigate actual CSR practices related to five different stakeholder groups, develop an instrument to measure those CSR practices, and apply it to a survey of 401 U.S. organizations. Four different clusters of organizations emerge, depending on the CSR practice focus. The distinctive features of each cluster relate to organizational demographics, perceived influence of stakeholders, managers' perceptions of the influence of CSR on performance, and organizational performance|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Vladimir Petkoski (2007). From International Corporate Responsibility to Local CSR. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:283-295.
Jeanne M. Logsdon & Harry J. van Buren Iii (2007). National Styles of Corporate Social Responsibility. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:253-268.
Diana Ingenhoff & A. Martina Koelling (2012). Media Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility of Media Organizations: An International Comparison. Business Ethics 21 (2):154-167.
Rafael Bravo, Jorge Matute & José M. Pina (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Vehicle to Reveal the Corporate Identity: A Study Focused on the Websites of Spanish Financial Entities. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):129-146.
Vladimir Petkoski (unknown). From International Corporate Responsibility to Local CSR: Empirical Evidence From Macedonia. :283-295.
Junwei Shi, Haiyan Fu & Lijun Hu (2007). Social Responsibility, Social Capital, and Corporate Competitive Advantage in Transitional China. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:377-394.
Humphry Hung (2011). Directors' Roles in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 103 (3):385-402.
Adam Lindgreen, Valérie Swaen, David Harness & Marieke Hoffmann (2011). The Role of 'High Potentials' in Integrating and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 99 (S1):73-91.
Adam Lindgreen, Valérie Swaen & Timothy T. Campbell (forthcoming). Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in Developing and Transitional Countries: Botswana and Malawi. Journal of Business Ethics.
Lisa Whitehouse (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Views From the Frontline. Journal of Business Ethics 63 (3):279 - 296.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #44,089 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?