David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (4):381-392 (2008)
This article argues that, as far as the problem of Confucian religiosity is concerned, there is an interpretative turn from Mou Zongsanâs moral metaphysics to Tu Weimingâs religious hermeneutics. Some concluding remarks are made: First, Tuâs hermeneutics is rooted in the ontology of self as interrelatedness, which is completely different from Mouâs theory of true self as transcendental subjectivity. Second, Tuâs hermeneutics of self can be better illuminated with the help of Heideggerâs notion of Dasein as Being-with (Mitsein). For Tu and Heidegger, self cannot be seen as something separate from community. This article also points out that the paradigmatic shift is evidenced in another similarity between the four categories of self, community, nature, and the transcendent in Tuâs hermeneutics on the one hand, and the four symbols of earth, sky, divinities, and mortals employed by Heidegger to interpret the meaning of dwelling, on the other. In such a primordial situation of dwelling, gods are not supposed to be intellectually known; they are rather to be neighbors in community
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Wing-tsit Chan (1963). A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, N.J.,Princeton University Press.
Martin Heidegger (1959). An Introduction to Metaphysics. New Haven, Yale University Press.
Martin Heidegger (1977/2008). Basic Writings: From Being and Time (1927) to the Task of Thinking (1964). Harper Perennial Modern Thought.
Martin Heidegger (1969). Identity and Difference. New York, Harper & Row.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Wing-Cheuk Chan (2011). Mou Zongsan on Confucian and Kant's Ethics: A Critical Reflection. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (s1):146-164.
Jason Clower (2010). The Unlikely Buddhologist: Tiantai Buddhism in Mou Zongsan's New Confucianism. Brill.
Sébastien Billioud (2011). Thinking Through Confucian Modernity: A Study of Mou Zongsan's Moral Metaphysics. Brill.
Lin Tongqi & Zhou Qin (1995). The Dynamism and Tension in the Anthropocosmic Vision of Mou Zongsan: -A Reflection on Confucian Concept of Tianren Heyi. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 22 (4):401-440.
Theodore George (2009). Günter Figal's hermeneutics. Philosophy Compass 4 (6):904-912.
Wing-Cheuk Chan (2011). Mou Zongsan and Tang Junyi on Zhang Zai's and Wang Fuzhi's Philosophies of Qi : A Critical Reflection. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (1):85-98.
Reena Patra (2006). A Comparative Study on Vaastu Shastra and Heidegger's 'Building, Dwelling and Thinking'. Asian Philosophy 16 (3):199 – 218.
Stephan Schmidt (2011). Mou Zongsan, Hegel, and Kant: The Quest for Confucian Modernity. Philosophy East and West 61 (2):260-302.
Sze-Kar Wan (2008). The Viability of Confucian Transcendence: Grappling with Tu Weiming's Interpretation of the Zhongyong. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (4):407-421.
Qiyong Guo (2007). Mou Zongsan's View of Interpreting Confucianism by “Moral Autonomy”. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):345-362.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #204,612 of 1,101,676 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #292,019 of 1,101,676 )
How can I increase my downloads?