David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 76 (4):413 - 426 (2007)
The ethical debate on whistleblowing concerns centrally the conflict between the right to political free speech and the duty of loyalty to the organization where one works. This is the moral dilemma of whistleblowing. Political free speech is justified because it is a central part of liberal democracy, whereas loyalty can be motivated as a way of showing consideration for one’s associates. The political philosophy of John Rawls is applied to this dilemma, and it is shown that the requirement of loyalty, in the sense that is needed to create the moral dilemma of whistleblowing, is inconsistent with that theory. In this sense, there is no moral dilemma of whistleblowing. This position has been labelled extreme in that it says that whistleblowing is always morally permitted. In a discussion and rejection of Richard De George’s criteria on permissible whistleblowing, it is pointed out that the mere rejection of loyalty will not lead to an extreme position; harms can still be taken into account. Furthermore, it is argued that the best way is, in this as in most other political circumstances, to weigh harms is provided by the free speech argument from democracy.
|Keywords||free speech justice as fairness loyalty permission for whistleblowing whistleblowing|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lars Lindblom (2011). The Structure of a Rawlsian Theory of Just Work. Journal of Business Ethics 101 (4):577-599.
Scott R. Paeth (2013). The Responsibility to Lie and the Obligation to Report. Journal of Business Ethics 112 (4):559-566.
Esther Pittroff (forthcoming). Whistle-Blowing Systems and Legitimacy Theory: A Study of the Motivation to Implement Whistle-Blowing Systems in German Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics.
Similar books and articles
Wim Vandekerckhove & Eva E. Tsahuridu (2010). Risky Rescues and the Duty to Blow the Whistle. Journal of Business Ethics 97 (3):365 - 380.
Heungsik Park & John Blenkinsopp (2009). Whistleblowing as Planned Behavior – a Survey of South Korean Police Officers. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4):545 - 556.
Randy K. Chiu (2003). Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing Intention: Examining the Moderating Role of Locus of Control. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 43 (1-2):65 - 74.
Janet P. Near & Terry Morehead Dworkin (1998). Responses to Legislative Changes: Corporate Whistleblowing Policies. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (14):1551 - 1561.
Stephen E. Loeb & Suzanne N. Cory (1989). Whistleblowing and Management Accounting: An Approach. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (12):903 - 916.
Wim Vandekerckhove (2006). Whistleblowing and Organizational Social Responsibility: A Global Assessment. Ashgate.
Jessica R. Mesmer-Magnus & Chockalingam Viswesvaran (2005). Whistleblowing in Organizations: An Examination of Correlates of Whistleblowing Intentions, Actions, and Retaliation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (3):277 - 297.
David Lewis (2011). Whistleblowing in a Changing Legal Climate: Is It Time to Revisit Our Approach to Trust and Loyalty at the Workplace? Business Ethics 20 (1):71-87.
Peter B. Jubb (1999). Whistleblowing: A Restrictive Definition and Interpretation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 21 (1):77 - 94.
Robert A. Larmer (1992). Whistleblowing and Employee Loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):125 - 128.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads210 ( #3,053 of 1,139,847 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #49,768 of 1,139,847 )
How can I increase my downloads?