Hesperus and Phosphorus
Philosophical Review 68 (4):515-518 (1959)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRod Bertolet (1994). Conventions and Coreferentiality. Journal of Philosophical Research 19:257-262.
Michael Tye (1978). The Puzzle of Hesperus and Phosphorus. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 56 (3):219 – 224.
John Tienson (1984). Hesperus and Phosphorus. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (1):16 – 25.
Mark Crimmins (1998). Hesperus and Phosphorus: Sense, Pretense, and Reference. Philosophical Review 107 (1):1-47.
Igal Kvart (1984). The Hesperus-Phosphorus Case. Theoria 50 (1):1-35.
James D. Carney (1980). The Hesperus and Phosphorus Puzzle. Mind 89 (356):577-581.
István Aranyosi (2009). Hesperus is Phosphorus, Indeed. Axiomathes 19 (2):223-224.
David J. Chalmers (2011). Propositions and Attitude Ascriptions: A Fregean Account. Noûs 45 (4):595-639.
Tobias Hansson Wahlberg (2009). Is Phosphorus Hesperus? Axiomathes 19 (1).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads14 ( #83,117 of 549,090 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,090 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
