Graduate studies at Western
Poiesis and Praxis 2 (1):73-78 (2003)
|Abstract||Degradations of environmental quality often pose severe harms or at least adverse effects to individuals and societies. Perceiving any environmental pollution thus appears to be connected with an implicit claim for its prompt and complete removal. For example, the oil-spill from the "Prestige" accident at the western Spanish shoreline is surely still in everyone's mind, whereâin a somewhat Sysiphos-effortâa lot of helpers tried to remove the huge masses of oil mud, washed repeatedly ashore. However, alternative rehabilitation conceptions are also conceivable for certain pollution problems, which may be less unhealthy and possibly more efficient. Among them, taking advantage of natural occurring processes, which are grouped in this context as "natural attenuation" (NA), is an emerging and challenging but possibly also a questionable approach. NA as remediation strategy is, therefore, often discussed controversially among experts and actors as well as in the public (Teutsch/RÃ¼gner 2000). This is partly due to still open scientific or technical questions but also due to legitimacy problems of natural attenuation on ethical and juridical levels (Steffens et al. 2002; Heinz 2002). Therefore, a balanced view on adequate natural attenuation seems to be necessary. The following analysis will review NA as rehabilitation means from the normative perspective, giving some general statementsâand thus orientationâfor public policy making as well as for the administrative level|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gabriel Eweje (2006). Environmental Costs and Responsibilities Resulting From Oil Exploitation in Developing Countries: The Case of the Niger Delta of Nigeria. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 69 (1):27 - 56.
Maurizio Lanfranchi (2011). Sustainable Technology as an Instrument of the Enviromental Policy for the Attainment of a Level of Socially Acceptable Pollution. World Futures 66 (6):449-454.
Paul Steidlmeier (1993). The Morality of Pollution Permits. Environmental Ethics 15 (2):133-150.
Kevin C. Elliott (2009). The Ethical Significance of Language in the Environmental Sciences: Case Studies From Pollution Research. Ethics, Place and Environment 12 (2):157 – 173.
Andrew Kernohan (1995). Rights Against Polluters. Environmental Ethics 17 (3):245-257.
Kevin Christopher Elliott (2010). Is a Little Pollution Good for You?: Incorporating Societal Values in Environmental Research. Oxford University Press.
Robert E. Manning (1999). Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 21 (2):191-207.
Armand H. Matheny Antommaria (2011). Growth Attenuation: To the Editor:To the Editor:To the Editor:To the Editor:Benjamin S. Wilfond Replies Health Outcomes and Social Services. Hastings Center Report 41 (5).
Ben A. Minteer, Elizabeth A. Corley & Robert E. Manning (2004). Environmental Ethics Beyond Principle? The Case for a Pragmatic Contextualism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):131-156.
Ben A. Minteer & Robert E. Manning (1999). Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics: Democracy, Pluralism, and the Management of Nature. Environmental Ethics 21 (2):191-207.
Judith N. Scoville (2002). Fitting Ethics to the Land: H. Richard Niebuhr's Ethic of Responsibility and Ecotheology. Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2):207 - 229.
Christopher W. Morris (2005). Natural Rights and Political Legitimacy. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):314-329.
Robert R. Higgins (1994). Race, Pollution, and the Mastery of Nature. Environmental Ethics 16 (3):251-264.
Robert Frodeman (2004). Environmental Philosophy and the Shaping of Public Policy. Environmental Philosophy 1 (1):6-12.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-02
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?