Graduate studies at Western
American Journal of Bioethics 9 (3):19 – 27 (2009)
|Abstract||Prior to passage of the Oregon Death with Dignity Act, opponents of assistance in dying argued that legalization would have serious harmful consequences. Specifically, they argued that the quality and availability of palliative care would decline, that the harms of legalization would affect certain vulnerable groups disproportionately, that legal assisted dying could not be confined to the competent terminally ill who voluntarily request assistance, and that the practice would result in frequent abuses. Data from Oregon's decade-long experience decisively refute the first three predictions. As to abuses, the record is not quite as clear, but if an appropriate framework for analysis is utilized, the most reasonable conclusion is that the risks of abuse do not outweigh the benefits of legalization. To the extent projected harmful consequences are relevant to the debate over legalization, Oregon's experience argues in favor of legalization of assistance in dying.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Vincent Norcidia (1969). Things We Know. By Frank B. Ebersole. Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon Books, 1967. Pp. Viii, 304, $7.50. Dialogue 8 (01):155-157.
Chris Durante (2009). Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Palliation: Re-Evaluating Ronald Lindsay's Evaluation of the Oregon Death with Dignity Act. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (3):28 – 29.
Theresa Drought (1992). Justice and the Moral Acceptability of Rationing Medical Care: The Oregon Experiment. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (1):97-117.
David Sclar (2006). U.S. Supreme Court Ruling in Gonzales V. Oregon Upholds the Oregon Death With Dignity Act. Journal of Law, Medicine
Ethics 34 (3):639-646.
Roger S. Magnusson (2009). The Traditional Account of Ethics and Law at the End of Life—and its Discontents. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):307-324.
Jyl Gentzler (2003). What is a Death with Dignity? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (4):461 – 487.
Kai-Yee Wong (2007). Euthanasia, Intentions, and the Doctrine of Killing and Letting Die. In A. Yeung & H. Li (eds.), New Essays in Applied Ethics: Animal Rights, Personhood, and the Ethics of Killing. Palgrave McMillan.
Courtney S. Campbell (2009). Northwest Passages. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 16 (1):66-78.
Added to index2009-03-08
Total downloads26 ( #53,605 of 723,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 723,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?