David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dissertation, Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2012)
This paper is concerned with a justifiable criterion of truth for an epistemic framework of linguistic knowledge. Chomskian nativism objects the behaviorist view that linguistic knowledge is acquired through experience. We evaluate both arguments on the nature of linguistic knowledge: is it acquired through experience or grounded in innate notions? If Chomsky's theories are true, propositions involving concepts or formal logic grounded in linguistic knowledge have a criterion of truth. The plausibility of innate notions of linguistic knowledge as a point of self-evidence is discussed: how can we justify both grammatical and lexical beliefs to be true without any prior inferential basis? My conclusion favours the nativist view as a plausible solution, but draws distinction between syntactic and lexical aspects of linguistic knowledge.
|Keywords||linguistic knowledge epistemology nativism behaviorism innateness experience|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Shaun Nichols (2005). Innateness and Moral Psychology. In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York: Oxford University Press New York. 353--369.
Andy Clark (1993). Minimal Rationalism. Mind 102 (408):587-610.
Glen Hoffmann (2009). Nativism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (3):303-315.
Glen Hoffmann (2009). Nativism: In Defense of the Representational Interpretation. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (27):303-315.
Mark McCullagh (2000). Solitary and Embedded Knowledge. Southwest Philosophy Review 16 (1):161-169.
William Ramsey & Stephen P. Stich (1990). Connectionism and Three Levels of Nativism. Synthese 82 (2):177-205.
Guy Longworth (2008). Linguistic Understanding and Knowledge. Noûs 42 (1):50–79.
Stephen Crain, Andrea Gualmini & Paul M. Pietroski (2005). Brass Tacks in Linguistic Theory: Innate Grammatical Principles. In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York: Oxford University Press New York. 1--175.
Barry C. Smith (2006). What I Know When I Know a Language. In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.
Fiona Cowie (1997). The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. Synthese 111 (1):17-51.
Barry C. Smith (2008). What Remains of Our Knowledge of Language? Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (22):557-75.
Michael Hannon (2013). 'Knows' Entails Truth. Journal of Philosophical Research 38:349-366.
Mark Textor (2009). Devitt on the Epistemic Authority of Linguistic Intuitions. Erkenntnis 71 (3):395 - 405.
Anne S. Hsu & Nick Chater (2010). The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition: A Probabilistic Perspective. Cognitive Science 34 (6):972-1016.
Added to index2012-03-31
Total downloads122 ( #7,985 of 1,103,048 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #11,162 of 1,103,048 )
How can I increase my downloads?