Plural quantification exposed

Noûs 37 (1):71–92 (2003)
This paper criticizes George Boolos's famous use of plural quantification to argue that monadic second-order logic is pure logic. I deny that plural quantification qualifies as pure logic and express serious misgivings about its alleged ontological innocence. My argument is based on an examination of what is involved in our understanding of the impredicative plural comprehension schema.
Keywords plural logic  Boolos
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1468-0068.00429
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,734
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Simon Hewitt (2012). Modalising Plurals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (5):853-875.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

166 ( #23,669 of 1,937,424 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

33 ( #15,070 of 1,937,424 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.