Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility in Controversial Industry Sectors: The Social Value of Harm Minimisation [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 110 (4):457-467 (2012)
This paper examines how it is possible for firms in controversial sectors, which are often marked by social taboos and moral debates, to act in socially responsible ways, and whether a firm can be socially responsible if it produces products harmful to society or individuals. It contends that a utilitarian justification can be used to support the legal and regulated provision of goods and services in these areas, and the regulated and legal provision of these areas produces less harm than the real alternative—illegal and unregulated supply. Utilitarianism is concerned as much with harm minimisation as good maximisation, and both are equally important when it comes to maximising welfare (Bentham 1789, 1970; Mill [1863] 1964). Any adequate theory of CSR must, therefore, have the capacity to handle a business that minimises harm as well as those that more straightforwardly maximise good. In this paper we therefore attempt two tasks. First, we argue that the legal but regulated provision of products and services may be better from an overall utilitarian perspective than a situation in which these harmful or immoral goods and services are illegal but procurable via a black market. Porter and Kramer’s (2006) strategic CSR framework is then presented to describe how firms in these controversial sectors can act in socially responsible ways. This model highlights the importance of firm strategy in selecting areas of socially responsible behaviours that can be acted upon by firms in each industry
Keywords Corporate social responsibility  Harm minimisation  Utilitarianism  Controversial sectors  Regulation  Strategic CSR
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1493-1
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,046
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
James Weber & Jennifer J. Griffin (2005). Industry Social Standings. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:190-195.
Andrea K. Young (2007). Using Industry Analysis to Develop Boundary Conditions for Responding to the Social Environment. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:289-293.
Pratima Bansal (2005). Responsible Strategic Decision Making. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:57-62.
Paul C. Godfrey, Nile A. Hatch & Jared M. Hansen (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:112-117.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

5 ( #528,990 of 1,934,456 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #434,193 of 1,934,456 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.