Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (2):38-44 (2006)
|Abstract||The pervasive tendency to characterize Plato and Aristotle as philosophers who are fundamentally in opposition blocks an adequate contemporary reception of their writings. This tendency results in superficial presentations of the philosophical concerns of both thinkers and obscures the historical affinity between their global projects. This article provides an example of a reading that respects the accord between Plato and Aristotle on one crucial issue: the foundation of a good life. With respect to Plato’s Republic, I demonstrate that the harmonization of the soul is the principal goal guiding the construction of the city in speech. Following this brief reading of the Republic, I turn to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics and argue that once one understands the parameters of the inquiry, one can see that the programmatic foundation hinges on the possibility of harmonizing the multifarious capacities and faculties of the soul. In the final section of the article I suggest that this harmonic reading of Plato and Aristotle has implications for the teaching of philosophical texts generally|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Benjamin Gleede (2012). Creatio Ex Nihilo – a Genuinely Philosophical Insight Derived From Plato and Aristotle? Some Notes on the Treatise on the Harmony Between the Two Sages. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 22 (1):91-117.
Rachel Barney (2008). The Carpenter and the Good. In D. Cairns, F. G. Herrmann & T. Penner (eds.), Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic. University of Edinburgh.
Christopher Bobonich (2007). Why Should Philosophers Rule? Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Protrepticus. Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (2):153-175.
Hallvard Fossheim (2012). Dialectic as Inter-Personal Activity: Self-Refutation and Dialectic in Plato and Aristotle / Luca Castagnoli ; The Role of the Respondent in Plato and Aristotle / Marja-Liisa Kakkuri-Knuuttila ; Division as a Method in Plato. In Jakob L. Fink (ed.), The Development of Dialectic From Plato to Aristotle. Cambridge University Press.
Wolfgang Kullmann (2012). Dialectical Methodology: What is Behind the Ti Esti Question? / Vasilis Politis ; Socratic Induction in Plato and Aristotle / Hayden W. Ausland ; Aristotle's Definition of Elenchus in the Light of Plato's Sophist / Louis-Andre Dorion ; The Aristotelian Elenchus / Robert Bolton ; Aristotle's Gradual Turn From Dialectic. In Jakob L. Fink (ed.), The Development of Dialectic From Plato to Aristotle. Cambridge University Press.
Lynne Spellman (1995). Substance and Separation in Aristotle. Cambridge University Press.
H. W. B. Joseph (1935/1971). Essays in Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
Henrik Syse (2010). The Platonic Roots of Just War Doctrine: A Reading of Plato’s Republic. Diametros 23:104-123.
George E. Karamanolis (2006). Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?: Platonists on Aristotle From Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford University Press.
David Robjant (2012). The Earthy Realism of Plato's Metaphysics, Or: What Shall We Do with Iris Murdoch? Philosophical Investigations 35 (1):43-67.
Vasilis Politis (2001). Anti-Realist Interpretations of Plato: Paul Natorp. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (1):47 – 62.
A. Bos & R. Ferwerda, Aristotle's De Spiritu as a Critique of the Doctrine of Pneuma in Plato and His Predecessors.
A. F. Mackay (2005). Aristotle's Dilemma. Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4):533 - 549.
Michael Davis (2011). The Soul of the Greeks: An Inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?