A funny thing happened to me on the way to salvation: Climacus as humorist in Kierkegaard's concluding unscientific postscript
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 33 (2):181-202 (1997)
According to James Conant, the 'revocations' made of the "Concluding Unscientific Postscript" and the "Tractatus" by their authors mean that we should view these texts as containing 'simple nonsense'. I firstly criticize the reading of the Postscript's 'revocation' which leads Conant to this conclusion. Next, I aim to show why we shall better understand the revocation's significance if we pay close attention to two factors: the pseudonymous author Johannes Climacus's description of himself as a 'humorist'; and, more importantly, what the text tells us about 'humour' as an entire existential life-view; one given much less attention in Kierkegaard scholarship than the much better-known 'aesthetic', 'ethical' and 'religious' views of life
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Antony Aumann (2009). Kierkegaard's Case for the Irrelevance of Philosophy. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (2):221-248.
Similar books and articles
Edward F. Mooney (2010). From the Garden of the Dead: Johannes Climacus on Religious and Irreligious Inwardness. In Rick Anthony Furtak (ed.), Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press
Rick Anthony Furtak (ed.) (2010). Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Søren Kierkegaard (1992). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments. Princeton University Press.
Alastair Hannay (2010). Johannes Climacus' Revocation. In Rick Anthony Furtak (ed.), Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press
Alexander Pruss, Faith, Paradox, Reason and the Argumentum Spiritus Sancti in Climacus and Kierkegaard.
Paul Muench (2010). Kierkegaard's Socratic Pseudonym: A Profile of Johannes Climacus. In Rick Anthony Furtak (ed.), Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press
Edward J. Hughes (1995). How Subjectivity Is Truth in the "Concluding Unscientific Postscript". Religious Studies 31 (2):197-208.
Søren Kierkegaard (2009). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs. Cambridge University Press.
C. Stephen Evans (2010). Faith and Reason in Kierkegaard's Concluding Unscientific Postscript. In Rick Anthony Furtak (ed.), Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press
Kristy Vipperman (1999). Climacus the (Multi-Dimensional) Humorist: Interpreting ‘an Understanding with the Reader’. Religious Studies 35 (3):347-362.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #99,022 of 1,906,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #40,586 of 1,906,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?