Electric Animal: Toward a Rhetoric of Wildlife

U of Minnesota Press (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Differentiation from animals helped to establish the notion of a human being, but the disappearance of animals now threatens that identity. This is the argument underlying Electric Animal, a probing exploration of the figure of the animal in modern culture. Akira Mizuta Lippit shows us the animal as a crucial figure in the definition of modernity -- essential to developments in the natural sciences and technology, radical transformations in modern philosophy and literature, and the advent of psychoanalysis and the cinema. Moving beyond the dialectical framework that has traditionally bound animal and human being, Electric Animal raises a series of questions regarding the idea of animality in Western thought. Can animals communicate? Do they have consciousness? Are they aware of death? By tracing questions such as these through a wide range of texts by writers ranging from Friedrich Nietzsche to Jacques Derrida, Sigmund Freud to Vicki Heame, Lewis Carroll to Franz Kafka, and Sergei Eisenstein to Gilles Deleuze, Lippit arrives at a remarkable thesis, revealing an extraordinary logical consensus in Western thought: animals do not have language and hence cannot die. The animal has, accordingly, haunted thought as a form of spectral and undead being. Lippit demonstrates how, in the late nineteenth century; this phantasmic concept of animal being reached the proportions of an epistemological crisis, engendering the disciplines and media of psychoanalysis, modern literature, and cinema, among others. Against the prohibitive logic of Western philosophy, these fields opened a space for rethinking animality. Technology, usually thought of in opposition to nature, came to serve as therepository for an unmournable animality -- a kind of vast wildlife museum. A highly original work that charts new territory in current debates over language and mortality, subjectivity and technology, Electric Animal brings to light fundamental questions about the status of representation -- of the animal and of ourselves -- in the age of biomechanical reproduction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Electric Animal. [REVIEW]Ralph R. Acampora - 2002 - Environmental Ethics 24 (2):219-220.
Filling the ark: animal welfare in disasters.Leslie Irvine - 2009 - Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Human diets and animal welfare: The illogic of the larder. [REVIEW]Gaverick Matheny & Kai M. A. Chan - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (6):579-594.
Saving animals from oil spills.Stephen Person - 2011 - New York, NY: Bearport.
Making Wildlife Viewable: Habituation and Attraction.John Knight - 2009 - Society and Animals 17 (2):167-184.
Animals and Sociology.Kay Peggs - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Wild Animals and American Environmental Ethics.Lisa Mighetto - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (3):276-277.
Human Sentiment and the Future of Wildlife.David E. Cooper - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):335 - 346.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
7 (#1,201,537)

6 months
2 (#670,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references