David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):79-99 (2008)
Though there are significant points of overlap between Michelle Kosch's reading of Fear and Trembling and my own, this paper focuses primarily on a significant difference: the legitimacy or otherwise of looking to paradigmatic exemplars of faith in order to understand faith. I argue that Kosch's reading threatens to underplay the importance of exemplarity in Kierkegaard's thought, and that there is good reason to resist her use of Philosophical Fragments as the key to interpreting the 'hidden message' of Fear and Trembling. Key to both claims is the Concluding Unscientific Postscript. I also briefly sketch an alternative reading of the 'hidden message', one in which Kierkegaard's Christian commitments play a notably different role.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Martha Craven Nussbaum (1990). Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press.
Martha C. Nussbaum (1990). Love's Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Michelle Kosch (2006). Freedom and Reason in Kant, Schelling, and Kierkegaard. Oxford University Press.
Stephen Mulhall (2001). Inheritance and Originality: Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kierkegaard. Oxford University Press.
Christopher A. P. Nelson (2005). Living Christianly: Kierkegaard's Dialectic of Christian Existence. Penn State University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michelle Kosch (2008). What Abraham Couldn't Say. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):59-78.
Michelle Kosch (2006). Kierkegaard's Ethicist: Fichte's Role in Kierkegaard's Construction of the Ethical Standpoint. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88 (3):261-295.
Phillip Stambovsky (2002). Mythemically Figuring the Limits of Ethical Reason. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:137-152.
Daniel Watts (2011). Dilemmatic Deliberations In Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling. Faith and Philosophy 28 (2):174-189.
Amy Laura Hall (2000). Self-Deception, Confusion, and Salvation in "Fear and Trembling" with "Works of Love". Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (1):37 - 61.
Jerome I. Gellmann (2001). Fear and Trembling. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):61-74.
Jerome I. Gellmann (2001). Fear and Trembling: Kierkegaard's Christian Work. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):61-74.
John Lippitt (2003). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kierkegaard and Fear and Trembling. Routledge.
Andrew Cross (2003). Faith and the Suspension of the Ethical in Fear and Trembling. Inquiry 46 (1):3 – 28.
Bruce Russell (1975). What is the Ethical in Fear and Trembling? Inquiry 18 (3):337 – 343.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #109,690 of 1,725,831 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,716 of 1,725,831 )
How can I increase my downloads?