Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):265-287 (2006)
|Abstract||Imprisonment imposes very substantial losses and deprivations on people convicted of crimes. The question for which crimes imprisonment is an appropriate sanction is addressed employing both retributive and crime reduction approaches to the justification of legal punishment. Although there is not complete convergence between what the two approaches imply about its use, it is argued that both would reserve imprisonment for serious offenses, ones that inflict or threaten significant harms with moderate to high levels of culpability. Thus, neither approach supports the current use of imprisonment to sanction a range of lesser offenses. Key Words: crime reduction imprisonment retribution.|
|Keywords||crime reduction imprisonment retribution|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Charles P. Nemeth (2008). Aquinas on Crime. St. Augustine's Press.
Thom Brooks (2008). Richard L. Lippke,Rethinking Imprisonment:Rethinking Imprisonment. Ethics 118 (3):562-564.
Jeremy Bentham (2009). The Rationale of Punishment. Prometheus Books.
Stuart P. Green (2006). Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime. Oxford University Press.
Jorge A. F. Godinho, On the Punishability of the Perpetrator of a Crime for the Laundering of the Respective Proceeds (Sobre a Punibilidade Do Autor de Um Crime Pelo Branqueamento Das Vantagens Dele Resultantes).
Michael T. Cahill (2009). Grading Arson. Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):79-95.
Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.) (2010). International Criminal Law and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #68,300 of 739,350 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,350 )
How can I increase my downloads?