David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (4):462-488 (2011)
Discussion in this paper focuses on how strongly we should prefer non-punishment of persons guilty of serious crimes to punishment of persons innocent of them. William Blackstone's version of that preference, expressed as a ten to one ratio, is first shown to be untenable on standard accounts of legal punishment's justifying aims. Somewhat weaker versions of that ratio also appear suspect. More to the point, Blackstone's adage obscures the crucial way in which there are risks to be assessed in setting up a criminal justice system - the risk that it will not be eff ective enough at apprehending and punishing serious off enders, as well as the risk that it will expose innocent persons to harsh punishment. I urge a balancing of such risks, and argue that the salient features of many contemporary criminal justice systems can be plausibly interpreted as attempting to achieve and maintain such a balance. We do not grant criminal defendants a presumption of innocence that the state must overcome with proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in order to institutionally express a strong degree of preference for non-punishment of the guilty to punishment of the innocent. Instead, we do so in order to ensure that institutions of legal punishment have suffi cient scope while preserving their ability to accurately sort the guilty from the innocent
|Keywords||PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE REASONABLE DOUBT DETERRENCE CRIMINAL TRIALS INCAPACITATION RETRIBUTION|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Richard L. Lippke (2014). The Prosecutor and the Presumption of Innocence. Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):337-352.
Similar books and articles
Larry Alexander (1983). Retributivism and the Inadvertent Punishment of the Innocent. Law and Philosophy 2 (2):233 - 246.
Alan Wertheimer (1977). Punishing the Innocent — Unintentionally. Inquiry 20 (1-4):45 – 65.
Zachary Hoskins (2011). ''Deterrent Punishment and Respect for Persons''. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 8 (2):369-384.
Richard L. Lippke (2009). Retributive Parsimony. Res Publica 15 (4):377-395.
Mark C. Murphy (2009). Not Penal Substitution but Vicarious Punishment. Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):253-273.
Thaddeus Metz (2012). Punishment. In Deen Chatterjee (ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Justice. Springer. 915-17.
George Schedler (2011). Retributivism and Fallible Systems of Punishment. Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):240-266.
Vicente Medina (2013). The Innocent in the Just War Thinking of Vitoria and Suárez: A Challenge Even for Secular Just War Theorists and International Law. Ratio Juris 26 (1):47-64.
Raffaele Rodogno (2009). Shame, Guilt, and Punishment. Law and Philosophy 28 (5):429 - 464.
Vidar Halvorsen (2004). Is It Better That ten Guilty Persons Go Free Than That One Innocent Person Be Convicted? Criminal Justice Ethics 23 (2):3-13.
Claudio Tamburrini (2010). Trading Truth for Justice? Res Publica 16 (2):153-167.
Whitley R. P. Kaufman (2004). Terrorism, Self-Defense, and the Killing of the Innocent. Social Philosophy Today 20:41-52.
Michael Cholbi (2010). Compulsory Victim Restitution is Punishment: A Reply to Boonin. Public Reason 2 (1):85-93.
Added to index2010-11-08
Total downloads64 ( #25,577 of 1,101,948 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #41,663 of 1,101,948 )
How can I increase my downloads?