David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):583-600 (2007)
One of the major divergences between dynamical systems theory and symbolism lies in their views on the role of representation in cognition. From the perspective of development, the cognitive development could be divided into three levels: sensorimotor, imagery representation and linguistic representation. It is claimed that representation is not a sufficient condition though it is necessary for cognition. However, it does not mean that the authors agree with the notion of strong coupling in dynamicism that completely rejects representation.
|Keywords||cognitive science representation cognitive development the dynamical system theory embodiment situatedness strong coupling 认知科学 表征 认知发展 动力系统理论 具身性 情境性 强耦合|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson & Eleanor Rosch (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press.
George Lakoff & Mark Johnson (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh the Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought.
Edmund Husserl (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston,Northwestern University Press.
David Morris, E. Thelen & L. B. Smith (1997). A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (2).
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alexander Riegler (ed.) (1999). Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences: Does Representation Need Reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.
Jiajie Zhang & Vimla L. Patel (2006). Distributed Cognition, Representation, and Affordance. Pragmatics and Cognition 14 (2):333-341.
Tony Chemero (2001). Dynamical Explanation and Mental Representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (4):141-142.
John Heil (1980). Cognition and Representation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (June):158-168.
Ángel García Rodríguez & Francisco Calvo Garzón (2010). Is Cognition a Matter of Representations?: Emulation, Teleology, and Time-Keeping in Biological Systems. Adaptive Behavior 18 (5):400-415.
Eoghan Mac Aogáin (2000). Emotion, Cognition, and Free Representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):210-210.
John Haugeland (2002). Andy Clark on Cognition and Representation. In Philosophy of Mental Representation. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Timothy L. Hubbard (2007). What is Mental Representation? And How Does It Relate to Consciousness? Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (1):37-61.
Maritza Rivera-Gaxiola & Juan Felipe Silva-Pereyra (2002). Is Syntax a Representation in Itself? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):352-353.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #185,953 of 1,911,555 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #115,074 of 1,911,555 )
How can I increase my downloads?