David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Philip Catton & Graham Macdonald (eds.), Karl Popper: Critical Appraisals. Routledge (2004)
One of the hallmark themes of Karl Popper’s approach to the social sciences was the insistence that when social scientists are members of the society they study, then they are liable to affect that society. In particular, they are liable to affect it in such a way that the claims they make lose their validity. “The interaction between the scientist’s pronouncements and social life almost invariably creates situations in which we have not only to consider the truth of such pronouncements, but also their actual influence on future developments. The social scientist may be striving to find the truth; but, at the same time, he must always be exerting a definite influence upon society. The very fact that his pronouncements do exert an influence destroys their objectivity.” (Popper 1963.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Philip Pettit (2006). When to Defer to Majority Testimony – and When Not. Analysis 66 (291):179–187.
Allan Hazlett (2015). Towards Social Accounts of Testimonial Asymmetries. Noûs 50 (2):n/a-n/a.
Ben Jeffares (2013). Back to Australopithecus: Utilizing New Theories of Cognition to Understand the Pliocene Hominins. Biological Theory 9 (1):1-12.
Franz Dietrich (2008). The Premises of Condorcet's Jury Theorem Are Not Simultaneously Justified. Episteme 5 (1):56-73.
Philip Pettit (2006). No Testimonial Route to Consensus. Episteme 3 (3):156-165.
Similar books and articles
Fred Eidlin (2005). Popper's Social‐Democratic Politics and Free‐Market Liberalism. Critical Review 17 (1-2):25-48.
Raimo Tuomela (1992). On the Structural Aspects of Collective Action and Free-Riding. Theory and Decision 32 (2):165-202.
Danny Frederick (2010). Popper and Free Will. Studia Philosophica Estonica 3 (1):21-38.
Mark A. Notturno (1998). Truth, Rationality, and the Situation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (3):400-421.
Kelly Trogdon (2009). Daniel Stoljar, Ignorance and Imagination: The Epistemic Origin of the Problem of Consciousness. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 118 (2):269-273.
Philip Pettit (1986). Free Riding and Foul Dealing. Journal of Philosophy 83 (7):361-379.
I. C. Jarvie & Sandra Pralong (eds.) (1999/2003). Popper's Open Society After Fifty Years: The Continuing Relevance of Karl Popper. Routledge.
David L. Hull (1999). The Use and Abuse of Sir Karl Popper. Biology and Philosophy 14 (4):481-504.
Philip Pettit (2004). An Epistemic Free-Riding Problem? In Philip Catton & Graham Macdonald (eds.), Karl Popper: Critical Appraisals. Routledge
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #225,555 of 1,796,259 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #169,168 of 1,796,259 )
How can I increase my downloads?