David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (4):377–390 (2005)
In a recent paper on ‘The Many as One’, Lewis A. Kornhauser and Lawrence G. Sager look at an issue that we take to be of great importance in political theory. How far should groups in public life try to speak with one voice, and act with one mind? How far should public groups try to display what Ronald Dworkin calls integrity? We do not expect the many on the market to be integrated in this sense. But should we expect integration among the many in the legislature, for example, or among the many on the courts? We agree with Kornhauser and Sager about a number of their claims but think that they miss out on important detail and do not achieve a fully general perspective on the issues raised. Our own contribution is in three sections. We address, first, the nature of the integrity challenge; second, the range of cases in which the challenge arises; and third, the question of whether public groups should be designed and required to meet that challenge.
|Keywords||doctrinal paradox discursive dilemma integrity group rationality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Christian List & Philip Pettit (2002). Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result. Economics and Philosophy 18 (1):89-110.
Christian List (2006). The Discursive Dilemma and Public Reason. Ethics 116 (2):362-402.
Lewis Carroll (1895). What the Tortoise Said to Achilles. Mind 4 (14):278-280.
Philip Pettit (2001). Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma. Noûs 35 (s1):268-299.
Christian List & Philip Pettit (2004). Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared. Synthese 140 (1-2):207 - 235.
Citations of this work BETA
Christian List (2012). The Theory of Judgment Aggregation: An Introductory Review. Synthese 187 (1):179-207.
Christian List (2005). Group Knowledge and Group Rationality: A Judgment Aggregation Perspective. Episteme 2 (1):25-38.
Philippe Mongin (2012). The Doctrinal Paradox, the Discursive Dilemma, and Logical Aggregation Theory. Theory and Decision 73 (3):315-355.
Christian List & Philip Pettit (2006). Group Agency and Supervenience. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):85-105.
Kendy M. Hess (2014). Because They Can: The Basis for the Moral Obligations of Collectives. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 38 (1):203-221.
Similar books and articles
Alan Sager (1989). Making Universal Health Insurance Work in Massachusetts. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 17 (3):269-282.
Cecil Miller (1960). Book Review:Man, the State, and War. Kenneth N. Waltz; The Politics of Mass Society. William Kornhauser. [REVIEW] Ethics 71 (1):63-.
Nina Eliasoph (1996). Making a Fragile Public: A Talk-Centered Study of Citizenship and Power. Sociological Theory 14 (3):262-289.
Alexander Sager (2005). Natural Ethical Facts: Evolution, Connectionism, and Moral Cognition. Dialogue 44 (4):820-824.
Lewis A. Kornhauser (2005). Economic Rationality in the Analysis of Legal Rules and Institutions. In Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell Pub. 67--79.
Andreas Herzig, Tiago de Lima & Emiliano Lorini (2009). On the Dynamics of Institutional Agreements. Synthese 171 (2):321-355.
Lewis Kornhauser, The Economic Analysis of Law. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Lewis A. Kornhauser & Lawrence G. Sager (2004). The Many as One: Integrity and Group Choice in Paradoxical Cases. Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (3):249–276.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads52 ( #79,473 of 1,793,096 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #101,373 of 1,793,096 )
How can I increase my downloads?