Republican freedom and the rule of law

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):201-220 (2006)
At the core of republican thought, on Philip Pettit’s account, lies the conception of freedom as non-domination, as opposed to freedom as noninterference in the liberal sense. I revisit the distinction between liberal and republican freedom and argue that republican freedom incorporates a particular rule-of-law requirement, whereas liberal freedom does not. Liberals may also endorse such a requirement, but not as part of their conception of freedom itself. I offer a formal analysis of this rule-of-law requirement and compare liberal and republican freedom on its basis. While I agree with Pettit that republican freedom has broader implications than liberal freedom, I conclude that we face a trade-off between two dimensions of freedom (scope and robustness) and that it is harder for republicans to solve that trade-off than it is for liberals. Key Words: freedom • republicanism • liberalism • noninterference • non-domination • rule of law • robustness • liberal paradox.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1470594X06064222
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,974
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Shyam Nair (2014). A Fault Line in Ethical Theory. Philosophical Perspectives 28 (1):173-200.
Paul Gowder (2013). The Rule of Law and Equality. Law and Philosophy 32 (5):565-618.
Guido Pincione (2011). The Constitution of Nondomination. Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (1):261-289.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Henry S. Richardson (2006). Republicanism and Democratic Injustice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):175-200.
Philip Pettit (2003). Discourse Theory and Republican Freedom. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):72-95.
K. Dowding (2011). Republican Freedom, Rights, and the Coalition Problem. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (3):301-322.
Philip Pettit (2006). Freedom in the Market. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):131-149.
Charles Larmore (2003). Liberal and Republican Conceptions of Freedom. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):96-119.
Melvin L. Rogers (2008). Republican Confusion and Liberal Clarification. Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (7):799-824.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2009). Liberal and Republican Freedom. Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (4):418-439.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

69 ( #47,592 of 1,725,867 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

15 ( #48,699 of 1,725,867 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.