David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (2):5 - 40 (1974)
This essay provides an exposition and critical assessment of Weber's typology of modes of practical reasoning and substitutes for practical reasoning, as well as of his definitions of the terms "ethics" and "religion." It then examines the application of these elements of "the sociology of rationalism" to religious systems of ethics. The author points out a number of difficulties in Weber's account, but concludes by insisting that it contains insights that are indispensable for the comparative study of religious ethics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John Kelsay (2010). Response to Papers for “Ethnography, Anthropology, and Comparative Religious Ethics” Focus. Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (3):485-493.
John Kelsay (2012). The Present State of the Comparative Study of Religious Ethics: An Update. Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (4):583-602.
Similar books and articles
David Little (1981). The Present State of the Comparative Study of Religious Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (2):210 - 227.
Donald K. Swearer (1979). Bhikkhu Buddhadāsa on Ethics and Society. Journal of Religious Ethics 7 (1):54 - 64.
Ronald M. Green & Charles H. Reynolds (1986). Cosmogony and the "Questions of Ethics". Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (1):139 - 156.
Aaron Stalnaker (2005). Comparative Religious Ethics and the Problem of “Human Nature”. Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):187-224.
John Kelsay (1996). Review: Plurality, Pluralism, and Comparative Ethics: A Review Essay. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (2):403 - 428.
Bradley E. Starr (1999). The Structure of Max Weber's Ethic of Responsibility. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (3):407 - 434.
Douglas Sturm (1974). The Priority of the Philosophical Question: A Response to David Little on Max Weber. Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (2):41 - 52.
Kevin Schilbrack (2002). Teaching Comparative Religious Ethics: A Review Essay. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2):295 - 312.
Pratap Bhanu Mehta (2001). The Ethical Irrationality of the World: Weber and Hindu Ethics. Critical Horizons 2 (2):203-225.
Thomas A. Lewis (2010). Ethnography, Anthropology, and Comparative Religious Ethics: Or Ethnography and the Comparative Religious Ethics Local. Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (3):395-403.
Max L. Stackhouse (1997). Assessing an Assessment: A Response to Ronald M. Green's Review of the "Journal of Religious Ethics". Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (3):275 - 279.
Aaron Stalnaker (2008). Judging Others: History, Ethics, and the Purposes of Comparison. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):425-444.
Wolfgang Schluchter (1996). Paradoxes of Modernity: Culture and Conduct in the Theory of Max Weber. Stanford University Press.
Frederick Bird (1981). Paradigms and Parameters for the Comparative Study of Religious and Ideological Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (2):157 - 185.
Michael Symonds & Jason Pudsey (2006). The Forms of Brotherly Love in Max Weber's Sociology of Religion. Sociological Theory 24 (2):133 - 149.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-29
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?