Acta Analytica 28 (2):145-159 (2013)
|Abstract||If evidence is propositional, is one’s evidence limited to true propositions or might false propositions constitute evidence? In this paper, I consider three recent attempts to show that there can be ‘false evidence,’ and argue that each of these attempts fails. The evidence for the thesis that evidence consists of truths is much stronger than the evidence offered in support of the theoretical assumptions that people have relied on to argue against this thesis. While I shall not defend the view that evidence is propositional, I shall defend the view that any propositional evidence must be true|
|Keywords||Evidence Justification Reasons for Belief Knowledge Epistemic rationality|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Fred I. Dretske (1971). Reasons, Knowledge, and Probability. Philosophy of Science 38 (2):216-220.
A. Moon (2012). Knowing Without Evidence. Mind 121 (482):309-331.
Aaron Rizzieri (2009). Evidence Does Not Equal Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 153 (2):235-242.
Alexander Arnold (2011). Some Evidence is False. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):165 - 172.
Clayton Littlejohn (2011). Evidence and Knowledge. Erkenntnis 74 (2):241-262.
Ram Neta (2008). What Evidence Do You Have? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (1):89-119.
Ben Almassi (2007). Experts, Evidence, and Epistemic Independence. Spontaneous Generations 1 (1):58-66.
David Christensen (2010). Higher-Order Evidence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):185-215.
Added to index2012-08-25
Total downloads56 ( #17,755 of 549,005 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #4,933 of 549,005 )
How can I increase my downloads?