David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):143 – 159 (2003)
Physics seems to tell us that there are four fundamental force-fields in nature: the gravitational, the electromagnetic, the weak, and the strong (or interactions). But it also seems to tell us that gravity cannot possibly be a force-field, in the same sense as the other three are. And yet the search for a grand unification of all four force-fields is today one of the hottest pursuits. Is this the result of a simple confusion? This article aims at clarifying this situation by (i) reviewing the gauge-field programme and its conception of unification of force-fields, (ii) examining the various attempts at a gauge theory of gravity, and (iii) articulating the nature of "gauging" and using it to explain the difference between gravity and the other force-fields.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Han Geurdes, On an Intrinsic Quantum Theoretical Structure Inside Einstein's Gravity Field Equations.
Reiner Hedrich, String Theory – Nomological Unification and the Epicycles of the Quantum Field Theory Paradigm.
Richard Healey (2007). Gauging What's Real. Oxford University Press.
Mael A. Melvin (1982). Towards Unified Field Theory: Quantitative Differences and Qualitative Sameness. Synthese 50 (3):359 - 397.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #32,986 of 1,100,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #27,600 of 1,100,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?