Graduate studies at Western
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):143 – 159 (2003)
|Abstract||Physics seems to tell us that there are four fundamental force-fields in nature: the gravitational, the electromagnetic, the weak, and the strong (or interactions). But it also seems to tell us that gravity cannot possibly be a force-field, in the same sense as the other three are. And yet the search for a grand unification of all four force-fields is today one of the hottest pursuits. Is this the result of a simple confusion? This article aims at clarifying this situation by (i) reviewing the gauge-field programme and its conception of unification of force-fields, (ii) examining the various attempts at a gauge theory of gravity, and (iii) articulating the nature of "gauging" and using it to explain the difference between gravity and the other force-fields.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Han Geurdes, On an Intrinsic Quantum Theoretical Structure Inside Einstein's Gravity Field Equations.
Reiner Hedrich, String Theory – Nomological Unification and the Epicycles of the Quantum Field Theory Paradigm.
Richard Healey (2007). Gauging What's Real. Oxford University Press.
Mael A. Melvin (1982). Towards Unified Field Theory: Quantitative Differences and Qualitative Sameness. Synthese 50 (3):359 - 397.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #32,694 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?