Graduate studies at Western
Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (4):658-674 (2006)
|Abstract||Considering the instability of nonlinear dynamics, the deductive inference rule Modus ponens itself is not enough to guarantee the validity of reasoning sequences in the real physical world, and similar results cannot necessarily be obtained from similar causes. Some kind of stability hypothesis should be added in order to draw meaningful conclusions. Hence, the uncertainty of deductive inference appears to be like that of inductive inference, and the asymmetry between deduction and induction becomes unrecognizable such as to undermine the basis for the fundamental cleavage between analytic truth and synthetic truth, as W. V. O. Quine pointed out. Induction is not inferior to deduction from a pragmatic point of view|
|Keywords||chaos Modus ponens asymmetry between deduction and induction|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jean-François Bonnefon (2011). Deduction From If-Then Personality Signatures. Thinking and Reasoning 16 (3):157-171.
Assaf Sharon & Levi Spectre (forthcoming). Epistemic Closure Under Deductive Inference: What is It and Can We Afford It? Synthese.
Dan E. Willard (2005). An Exploration of the Partial Respects in Which an Axiom System Recognizing Solely Addition as a Total Function Can Verify its Own Consistency. Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (4):1171-1209.
Guy Politzer (2005). Uncertainty and the Suppression of Inferences. Thinking and Reasoning 11 (1):5 – 33.
Joshua Schechter & David Enoch (2006). Meaning and Justification: The Case of Modus Ponens. Noûs 40 (4):687 - 715.
Colin Howson (2009). Sorites is No Threat to Modus Ponens: A Reply to Kochan. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (2):209-212.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,498 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?