On the Limited Foundations of Western Skepticism towards Indigenous Psychological Thinking: Pragmatics, Politics, and Philosophy of Indigenous Psychology
Social Epistemology 25 (2):133 - 140 (2011)
|Abstract||The problem of defining culture has exercised anthropologists but not cross?cultural psychologists because psychological science is based on quantitative forms of empiricism where the validity of categorical boundaries is determined by their predictive utility. Furthermore, many indigenous psychologies have been allied to nation?building projects in the developing world that choose to gloss over within state ethnic differences for the purposes of national strength and unity. Finally, Carl Martin Allwood?s target article ?On the foundation of the indigenous psychologies? (2011, Social Epistemology 25 (1): 3?14) is grounded in western thinking about science that privileges analytical philosophy, particularly the importance of constructing definitional categories as the basis of its critique of indigenous psychologies. This is a limited basis for thinking about psychological science whose flaws have been exposed by highly visible critiques on analytical versus holistic thinking. From the point of view of Asian social psychologists, there is no analytical solution as to where to draw the boundaries of culture because culture is a social construction that will vary according to the situation and motives at play in different situations. But this is not an intractable problem because all human psychology is intentionally realized with elements of social construction that are part and parcel of experienced reality|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kwang‐Kuo Hwang (2011). Reification of Culture in Indigenous Psychologies: Merit or Mistake? Social Epistemology 25 (2):125 - 131.
Carl Martin Allwood (2011). On the Use of the Culture Concept in the Indigenous Psychologies: Reply to Hwang and Liu. Social Epistemology 25 (2):141 - 152.
Martin Evenden & Gregory Sandstrom (2011). Calling for Scientific Revolution in Psychology: K. K. Hwang on Indigenous Psychologies. Social Epistemology 25 (2):153 - 166.
Carl Martin Allwood (2011). On the Foundation of the Indigenous Psychologies. Social Epistemology 25 (1):3-14.
Henry S. R. Kao & Durganand Sinha (eds.) (1996). Asian Perspectives on Psychology. Sage Publications.
Megan Jane Davis, Indigenous Rights and the Constitution: Making the Case for Constitutional Reform.
L. Petchkovsky (2000). 'Stream of Consciousness' and 'Ownership of Thought' in Indigenous People in Central Australia. Journal of Analytical Psychology 45 (4):577-597.
J. Baird Callicott (2000). The Indigenous World or Many Indigenous Worlds? Environmental Ethics 22 (3):291-310.
Cristian Rojas & Marco Galetta (2008). Indigenous Rights in The Venezuelan Legislation. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 11:137-147.
Carl Martin Allwood (2002). Indigenized Psychologies. Social Epistemology 16 (4):349 – 366.
Added to index2011-04-22
Total downloads14 ( #90,504 of 722,839 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,839 )
How can I increase my downloads?