Graduate studies at Western
The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:119-124 (2006)
|Abstract||This paper critically evaluates Habermas's social-philosophical exploration of the public sphere in the age of mass communication, which addresses a key question: "Is the public possible in the sociohistorical formation of the mass public sphere?" In his genealogical analysis of different public spheres from feudal to modern times, Habermas indicates that the emergence of inter-subjectivity is historically based upon the dichotomy of private / public (subjective/objective). He emphasizes the opposition of the "subjective side" of rationality to its "objective side" while dealing with the public spheres in different historical periods. Habermas points out that the notion of the public can exist only at the face-to-face level communication. It is impossible for the (impersonal) masses to construct any sense of publicness, since there are no historical and social conditions in which the masses of working class can establish an "autonomous private sphere" outside of material production and consumption, as the bourgeoisie did. In this way, Habermas ambivalently argues that the public is not possible in the mass public sphere|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Agnes S. Ku (2000). Revisiting the Notion of "Public" in Habermas's Theory-Toward a Theory of Politics of Public Credibility. Sociological Theory 18 (2):216-240.
Asaf Bar-Tura (2010). Arendt, Habermas and Facebook: Participation and Discourse in Cyber Public Spheres. Humanities and Technology Review 29:1-25.
John S. Brady (2004). No Contest? Assessing the Agonistic Critiques of Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of the Public Sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (3):331-354.
David Randall (2011). The Prudential Public Sphere. Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (3):205-226.
Codruţa Cuceu (2011). Milestones in the Critique of the Public Sphere: Dewey and Arendt. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):99-110.
David S. Allen (1995). Separating the Press and the Public. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 10 (4):197 – 209.
Krishan Kumar & Ekaterina Makarova (2008). The Portable Home: The Domestication of Public Space. Sociological Theory 26 (4):324 - 343.
D. Beybin Kejanlioğlu (2007). The 'Public Sphere' and the Problem of 'Information'. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:43-50.
Drew Pierce (unknown). Toward a Critique of Systematically Distorting Communication Technology: Habermas, Baudrillard, and Mass Media. :89-102.
D. R. Walhof (2013). Habermas, Same-Sex Marriage and the Problem of Religion in Public Life. Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (3):225-242.
Weidong Cao (2006). The Historical Effect of Habermas in the Chinese Context: A Case Study of the Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (1):41-50.
Drew Pierce (2006). Toward a Critique of Systematically Distorting Communication Technology. Social Philosophy Today 22:89-102.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads3 ( #213,731 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?