David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32 (3):391-407 (2005)
In this paper, I attempt to make use of Western metaphysical taxonomy to explicate the cosmological variances in Chinese philosophical schools, especially with regard to the debates among the Neo-Confucian thinkers. While I do not presume that Chinese philosophers dealt with the same Western issues, I do believe that a comparative study of this nature can point to a new direction of thinking concerning the metaphysical debates in Neo-Confucianism. This paper is divided into three parts. In Part I, I employ Robert Nozick’s notion of natural cosmic state to analyze the fundamental difference between the Confucian and Daoist cosmologies. Even though this notion of natural cosmic state has no comparable match in Chinese philosophy, it may serve as a schematizing device for our comparative study of Chinese cosmology. In Part II, I employ Nicholas Rescher’s distinction between “laws of nature” and “laws for nature” to analyze the debate on the status of cosmic principle (li)a between Zhou Dunyib and Zhu Xic on the one hand, and Zhang Zaid and Wang Fuzhie on the other. 1 In Part III, I employ the notion of supervenience, as defined by <span class='Hi'>Jaegwon</span> Kim, to argue that in the debate on the status of cosmic principle, it is Zhang Zai and Wang Fuzhi’s view that better preserves the causal relevance of cosmic principle..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Chung-ying Cheng (1997). On a Comprehensive Theory of Xing (Naturality) in Song-Ming Neo-Confucian Philosophy: A Critical and Integrative Development. Philosophy East and West 47 (1):33-46.
Kim Sungmoon (2009). Trouble with Korean Confucianism: Scholar-Official Between Ideal and Reality. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (1):29-48.
Russell Hatton (1988). Is ch'I Recycled? The Debate Within the Neo-Confucian Tradition and its Implications with Respect to the Principle of Personal Identity. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 15 (3):289-318.
Renqiu Zhu (2009). The Formation, Development and Evolution of Neo-Confucianism — with a Focus on the Doctrine of “Stilling the Nature” in the Song Period. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):322-342.
Ira E. Kasoff (1984). The Thought of Chang Tsai (1020-1077). Cambridge University Press.
Haiming Wen (2011). Continuity of Heart-Mind and Things-Events: A Systematic Reconstruction of Neo-Confucian Epistemology. Asian Philosophy 21 (3):269 - 290.
Qiyong Guo (2006). An Exposition of Zhou Yi Studies in Modern Neo-Confucianism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (2):185-203.
Jinglin Li (2006). The Ontologicalization of the Confucian Concept of Xin Xing: Zhou Lianxi's Founding Contribution to the Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (2):204-221.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #41,481 of 1,692,429 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #29,222 of 1,692,429 )
How can I increase my downloads?