Graduate studies at Western
Oxford University Press (2005)
|Abstract||In Art and intention Paisley Livingston develops a broad and balanced perspective on perennial disputes between intentionalists and anti-intentionalists in philosophical aesthetics and critical theory. He surveys and assesses a wide range of rival assumptions about the nature of intentions and the status of intentionalist psychology. With detailed reference to examples from diverse media, art forms, and traditions, he demonstrates that insights into the multiple functions of intentions have important implications for our understanding of artistic creation and authorship, the ontology of art, conceptions of texts, works, and versions, basic issues pertaining to the nature of fiction and fictional truth, and the theory of art interpretation and appreciation. Livingston argues that neither the inspirationist nor rationalistic conceptions can capture the blending of deliberate and intentional, spontaneous and unintentional processes in the creation of art. Texts, works, and artistic structures and performances cannot be adequately individuated in the absence of a recognition of the relevant makers4intentions. The distinction between complete and incomplete works receives an action-theoretic analysis that makes possible an elucidation of several different senses of "fragment" in critical discourse. Livingston develops an account of authorship, contending that the recognition of intentions is in fact crucial to our understanding of diverse forms of collective art-making. An artist's short-term intentions and long-term plans and policies interact in complex ways in the emergence of an artistic oeuvre, and our uptake of such attitudes makes an important difference to our appreciation of the relations between items belonging to a single life-work. The intentionalism Livingston advocates is, however, a partial one, and accommodates a number of important anti-intentionalist contentions. Intentions are fallible, and works of art, like other artefacts, can be put to a bewildering diversity of uses. Yet some important aspects of art's meaning and value are linked to the artist's aims and activities.|
|Keywords||Art and philosophy Intention Art criticism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$19.98 used (80% off) $23.37 new (77% off) $93.10 direct from Amazon (6% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||N71.L5955 2005|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Goldie (2007). Towards a Virtue Theory of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (4):372-387.
Jerrold Levinson (2007). Review: Artful Intentions: Paisley Livingston, Art and Intention: A Philosophical Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (3):299 - 305.
Berys Nigel Gaut & Paisley Livingston (eds.) (2003). The Creation of Art: New Essays in Philosophical Aesthetics. Cambridge University Press.
Hans Maes (2010). Intention, Interpretation and Contemporary Visual Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2):121-138.
Dominic McIver Lopes (2007). Conceptual Art is Not What It Seems. In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford University Press.
Lars Aagaard-Mogensen (ed.) (1976). Culture and Art: An Anthology. Humanities Press.
Erich Neumann (1959/1971). Art and the Creative Unconscious: Four Essays. Princeton University Press.
Jerrold Levinson (2007). Artful Intentions: Paisley Livingston, Art and Intention: A Philosophical Study. Art and Intention: A Philosophical Study by Livingston, Paisley. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (3):299–305.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads88 ( #10,130 of 739,375 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,375 )
How can I increase my downloads?