Cultural adaptation and evolved, general-purpose cognitive mechanisms are sufficient to explain belief in souls
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):479-480 (2006)
|Abstract||It is suggested that general-purpose cognitive modules are the proper endophenotypes on which evolution has operated, not special purpose belief modules. These general-purpose modules operate to extract adaptive cultural patterns. Belief in souls may be adaptive and based in evolved systems without requiring that a specific cognitive system has evolved to support just such beliefs.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eric Alden Smith (2002). The Fuzzy Zone Between Exaptation and Phenotypic Adaptation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):529-530.
Dan Sperber & Lawrence A. Hirschfeld, The Cognitive Foundations of Cultural Stability and Diversity.
Pascal Boyer (1998). Cultural Transmission with an Evolved Intuitive Ontology: Domain-Specific Cognitive Tracks of Inheritance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):570-571.
Andrew Howat (2010). Review: Some Pragmatist Themes. [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):143-149.
Robert Arp (2005). Scenario Visualization: One Explanation of Creative Problem Solving. Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (3):31-60.
Jesse M. Bering (2006). The Cognitive Science of Souls: Clarifications and Extensions of the Evolutionary Model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):486-493.
Jesse M. Bering (2006). The Folk Psychology of Souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):453-+.
Dominic Murphy (2005). Can Evolution Explain Insanity? Biology and Philosophy 20 (4):745-766.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #188,845 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?