Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||My aim in this paper is to begin a discussion about how, and to what extent, Martin Heidegger’s thinking about technology offers helpful critical terms for thinking about the nature and global sway of today’s most dominant and prevalent forms of technology, namely the interrelated technologies of information, communication, and (capitalist) commerce. My suggestion will be that Heidegger’s thought does indeed have implications for critical thinking about these technologies, but that in order to see how it does, we may have to deepen and further radicalize some of Heidegger’s suggestions about essence, being, and form. This need for deepening is connected with the way in which these specific technologies themselves depend on the character and structure of language , in that they present themselves as effective means for the manipulation, storage, retrieval and exchange of broadly linguistic, symbolic, and informational material. In fact, in the context of Heidegger’s late thought about technology as well as language, the syntagm “information technology” itself – a term that, as far as I know, Heidegger himself never used – nevertheless points the way, as I shall argue, to a deepening of the Heideggerian inquiry into form which itself can facilitate an improved critical understanding of the implications of these technologies for life around the planet today|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Don Ihde (2010). Heidegger's Technologies: Postphenomenological Perspectives. Fordham University Press.
Tracy Colony (2009). Concerning Technology. Idealistic Studies 39 (1/3):23-34.
Fredrik Svenaeus (2013). The Relevance of Heidegger's Philosophy of Technology for Biomedical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (1):1-15.
Søren Riis (2011). Towards the Origin of Modern Technology: Reconfiguring Martin Heidegger's Thinking. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 44 (1):103-117.
Martin Heidegger & Wanda Torres Gregory (1998). Traditional Language and Technological Language. Journal of Philosophical Research 23:129-145.
Iain Thomson (2000). From the Question Concerning Technology to the Quest for a Democratic Technology: Heidegger, Marcuse, Feenberg. Inquiry 43 (2):203 – 215.
Maren Klawiter (1990). Using Arendt and Heidegger to Consider Feminist Thinking on Women and Reproductive / Infertility Technologies. Hypatia 5 (3):65 - 89.
Andrew Feenberg (2000). The Ontic and the Ontological in Heidegger's Philosophy of Technology: Response to Thomson. Inquiry 43 (4):445 – 450.
John Sallis (ed.) (1970). Heidegger and the Path of Thinking. Pittsburgh,Duquesne University Press.
Trish Glazebrook (2000). Heidegger's Philosophy of Science. Fordham University Press.
Dana S. Belu & Andrew Feenberg (2010). Heidegger's Aporetic Ontology of Technology. Inquiry 53 (1):1-19.
Iain Thomson (2000). What's Wrong with Being a Technological Essentialist? A Response to Feenberg. Inquiry 43 (4):429 – 444.
J. E. Tiles (1990). Information Technology From Homer to Dendral. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):205 – 220.
Added to index2012-01-25
Total downloads47 ( #27,416 of 739,395 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,616 of 739,395 )
How can I increase my downloads?