Is God a Mathematician?
Simon & Schuster (2009)
|Abstract||Nobel Laureate Eugene Wigner once wondered about "the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics" in the formulation of the laws of nature. Is God a Mathematician? investigates why mathematics is as powerful as it is. From ancient times to the present, scientists and philosophers have marveled at how such a seemingly abstract discipline could so perfectly explain the natural world. More than that -- mathematics has often made predictions, for example, about subatomic particles or cosmic phenomena that were unknown at the time, but later were proven to be true. Is mathematics ultimately invented or discovered? If, as Einstein insisted, mathematics is "a product of human thought that is independent of experience," how can it so accurately describe and even predict the world around us? Mathematicians themselves often insist that their work has no practical effect. The British mathematician G. H. Hardy went so far as to describe his own work this way: "No discovery of mine has made, or is likely to make, directly or indirectly, for good or ill, the least difference to the amenity of the world." He was wrong. The Hardy-Weinberg law allows population geneticists to predict how genes are transmitted from one generation to the next, and Hardy's work on the theory of numbers found unexpected implications in the development of codes. Physicist and author Mario Livio brilliantly explores mathematical ideas from Pythagoras to the present day as he shows us how intriguing questions and ingenious answers have led to ever deeper insights into our world. This fascinating book will interest anyone curious about the human mind, the scientific world, and the relationship between them|
|Keywords||Mathematics Philosophy Logic, Symbolic and mathematical Mathematicians Psychology Discoveries in science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$0.84 used (95% off) $5.00 new (69% off) $13.42 direct from Amazon (17% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||QA8.4.L586 2009|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew Arana (2007). Review of D. Corfield, Toward a Philosophy of Real Mathematics. [REVIEW] Mathematical Intelligencer 29 (2).
Solomon Feferman, Harvey M. Friedman, Penelope Maddy & John R. Steel (2000). Does Mathematics Need New Axioms? Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (4):401-446.
Christopher Pincock (2009). Towards a Philosophy of Applied Mathematics. In Otávio Bueno & Øystein Linnebo (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Robin Hirsch (1996). Is Mathematics a Pure Science? Science and Society 60 (1):58 - 79.
Charles S. Chihara (1990). Constructibility and Mathematical Existence. Oxford University Press.
Andrew Arana (2007). Review of D. Corfield's Toward A Philosophy Of Real Mathematics. [REVIEW] Mathematical Intelligencer 29 (2).
Keith Devlin (2008). A Mathematician Reflects on the Useful and Reliable Illusion of Reality in Mathematics. Erkenntnis 68 (3):359 - 379.
Paul Jorion (1999). What Do Mathematicians Teach Us About the World ? An Anthropological Perspective. .
Mary Leng, Alexander Paseau & Michael D. Potter (eds.) (2007). Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?