David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 46 (3):324 – 345 (2003)
Heidegger's treatment of 'machination' in the Beiträge zur Philosophie begins the critique of technological thinking that would centrally characterize his later work. Unlike later discussions of technology, the critique of machination in Beiträge connects its arising to the predominance of 'lived-experience' ( Erlebnis ) as the concealed basis for the possibility of a pre-delineated, rule-based metaphysical understanding of the world. In this essay I explore this connection. The unity of machination and lived-experience becomes intelligible when both are traced to their common root in the primordial Greek attitude of techne , originally a basic attitude of wondering knowledge of nature. But with this common root revealed, the basic connection between machination and lived-experience also emerges as an important development of one of the deepest guiding thoughts of the Western philosophical tradition: the Parmenidean assertion of the sameness of being and thinking. In the Beiträge 's analysis of machination and lived-experience, Heidegger hopes to discover a way of thinking that avoids the Western tradition's constant basic assumption of self-identity, an assumption which culminates in the modern picture of the autonomous, self-identical subject aggressively set over against a pre-delineated world of objects in a relationship of mutual confrontation. In the final section, I investigate an important and illuminating parallel to Heidegger's result: the consideration of the relationship between experience and technological ways of thinking that forms the basis of the late Wittgenstein's famous rule-following considerations.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Fredrik Svenaeus (2000). The Body Uncanny — Further Steps Towards a Phenomenology of Illness. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (2):125-137.
Jeremy H. Smith (2006). Michel Henry's Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience and Husserlian Intentionality. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (2):191 – 219.
Steven Segal (2011). A Heideggerian Perspective on the Relationship Between Mintzberg's Distinction Between Engaged and Disconnected Management: The Role of Uncertainty in Management. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 103 (3):469-483.
Robert S. Gall (2003). Interrupting Speculation: The Thinking of Heidegger and Greek Tragedy. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 36 (2):177-194.
William L. McBride (1981). Sartre and Lived Experience. Research in Phenomenology 11 (1):75-89.
David Wood (2002). Thinking After Heidegger. Blackwell Publishers.
Trish Glazebrook (2000). Heidegger's Philosophy of Science. Fordham University Press.
Stacey Irwin (2005). Technological Other/Quasi Other: Reflection on Lived Experience. [REVIEW] Human Studies 28 (4):453 - 467.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #45,329 of 1,100,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #40,727 of 1,100,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?