John P. Lizza, Commentary on "the incoherence of determining death by neurological criteria" | PhilPapers

Report a bug on this page | Sign in | Create an account

Entries: 207,464 New this week: 198

General search Category finder


advanced search \| help \| use + and * as usual.

Off-campus access

Using PhilPapers from home?

Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.

John P. Lizza (2009). Commentary on "the Incoherence of Determining Death by Neurological Criteria". Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (4):pp. 393-395.
Philosophy of Neuroscience in Philosophy of Cognitive Science
Biomedical Ethics in Applied Ethics
In my reading list | Discuss this article | Edit | Categorize |

My bibliography |

Export citation | Scholar
4 downloads | Added to index:2010-01-19 | Mark as duplicate | Delete from index

Discussion of John P. Lizza, Commentary on "the incoherence of determining death by neurological criteria"

Nothing in this forum yet.

Similar books and articles

91.2Franklin G. Miller Robert D. Truog (2009). The Incoherence of Determining Death by Neurological Criteria: A Commentary on Controversies in the Determination of Death , a White Paper by the President's Council on Bioethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (2):pp. 185-193.

Brain Death in Applied Ethics

In my reading list | Discuss this article | Edit | Categorize |

My bibliography

|

Export citation

| Scholar | More..

88.7Franklin G. Miller Robert D. Truog (2009). The Incoherence of Determining Death by Neurological Criteria: Reply to John Lizza. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (4):pp. 397-399.

Philosophy of Neuroscience in Philosophy of Cognitive Science

Biomedical Ethics in Applied Ethics

In my reading list | Discuss this article | Edit | Categorize |

My bibliography

|

Export citation

| Scholar | More..