David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Diametros 26:44-57 (2010)
The concept of potentiality is often invoked in debate over the moral status of human embryos. It has also been invoked, though less prominently, in debate over the moral status of anencephalic infants, individuals in permanent vegetative state, and the whole-brain dead. In this paper, I examine some of the theoretical assumptions underlying the concept of potentiality invoked in these debates. I show how parties in the debate over the ethical significance of potentiality have been talking past each other to a large extent because they rely on different concepts of potentiality. The conceptual differences are traced to different assumptions about the nature of persons and whether external factors may affect determinations of possibility and therefore potentiality. Any assessment about the ethical significance of potentiality therefore requires an evaluation of alternative concepts personhood and the connection between possibility and potentiality.
|Keywords||bioethics abortion potentiality pesonhood|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alfonso Gómez-Lobo (2005). On Potentiality and Respect for Embryos: A Reply to Mary Mahowald. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (2):105-110.
Elizabeth Harman (2003). The Potentiality Problem. Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):173 - 198.
Stephen S. Hanson (2006). “More on Respect for Embryos and Potentiality: Does Respect for Embryos Entail Respect for in Vitro Embryos?”. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):215-226.
Marco Stier & Bettina Schoene-Seifert (2013). The Argument From Potentiality in the Embryo Protection Debate: Finally “Depotentialized”? American Journal of Bioethics 13 (1):19-27.
Michael Gorman (2011). Personhood, Potentiality, and Normativity. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (3):483-498.
John P. Lizza (2005). Potentiality, Irreversibility, and Death. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):45 – 64.
Alfonso Gómez-Lobo (2004). Does Respect for Embryos Entail Respect for Gametes? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):199-208.
Mary Louise Gill (2004). Part I: Analysis of Dynamic Categories: Aristotle's Distinction Between Change and Activity. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 14 (1-3):3-22.
John P. Lizza (2007). Potentiality and Human Embryos. Bioethics 21 (7):379–385.
Charlotte Witt (2003). Ways of Being: Potentiality and Actuality in Aristotle's Metaphysics. Cornell University Press.
Chris Meyers (2010). The Fetal Position: A Rational Approach to the Abortion Debate. Prometheus Books.
Asle H. Kiran (2012). Technological Presence: Actuality and Potentiality in Subject Constitution. [REVIEW] Human Studies 35 (1):77-93.
Mary B. Mahowald (2005). Another View of Potentiality and Human Embryos. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (2):111-113.
John E. Pogue (1998). Feinberg, Potentiality, and Abortion. Philosophia 26 (1-2):219-230.
Added to index2011-10-19
Total downloads30 ( #90,983 of 1,699,820 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #128,702 of 1,699,820 )
How can I increase my downloads?